Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/36792
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgostinho, I. S. Mendespt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMendes, M. A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarques, A. S. Pires de Diaspt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T17:53:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-31T17:53:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/36792-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and objectives: Education and psychosocial support is a core component of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Nevertheless, measurement tools used to assess the effects of this component of PR have been scarcely investigated. Thus, this systematic literature review aimed to identify which measurement tools have been used to assess education and psychosocial support of PR in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD.) Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science in February 2021. Articles were screened and inclusion decided by two independent researchers. Randomised control studies, quasi-experimental and pre-post studies, which included people with COPD enrolled in a PR programme, with exercise and education and psychosocial support, were included. The same two independent researchers extracted the data to a standardised table. Results: A total of 7112 studies were screened and 9 studies were included. 1121 people with COPD (68.69 ± 8.98 years old, 30.78% female, FEV1pp 53.25 ± 19.04%) were enrolled in the included studies. A total of 9 measurement tools were identified and the most reported was the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ) (n = 3, 33.3%). Other measurement tools were found, such as the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) (n = 1, 11.1%), the Education Specific Questionnaire (ESQ) (n = 1, 11.1%), the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ) (n = 1, 11.1%), the COPD Knowledge Test (n = 1, 11.1%), the Pulmonary Disease Knowledge Test (PDKT) (n = 1, 11.1%), the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) (n = 1, 11.1%), the Understanding COPD Questionnaire (UCOPD) (n = 1, 11.1%) and the Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (n = 1, 11.1%). Conclusions: This review has shown that there are nine measurement tools available to assess the effects of education and psychosocial support of PR in people with COPD. The most reported has been the BCKQ however, few studies assessing this component in PR programmes have been conducted. Given the importance of education and psychosocial support of PR for people with COPD, future research is urgently needed to provide recommendations on the most suitable measurement tools and promote its routine assessment.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherSociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia; Elsevierpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectRespiratory rehabilitationpt_PT
dc.subjectCOPDpt_PT
dc.subjectEducation programpt_PT
dc.subjectPsychosocial interventionpt_PT
dc.titleMeasurement tools to assess education and psychosocial support of pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature reviewpt_PT
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
ua.event.date11-13 novembro, 2021pt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage103pt_PT
degois.publication.issueSC2pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage104pt_PT
degois.publication.title37º Congresso de Pneumologia. Pulmonologypt_PT
degois.publication.volume27pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journalpulmonology.org/en-pdf-X2531043721010270pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn2531-0437-
Appears in Collections:ESSUA - Comunicações
Lab3R - Comunicações

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Agostinho_MEASUREMENT TOOLS TO ASSESS EDUCATION.pdf1.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.