Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/27676
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Anapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorLage, Susanpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Aldapt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-26T15:31:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-26T15:31:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-13-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/27676-
dc.description.abstractComputerised adventitious respiratory sounds have been indicated as a promising outcome measure to monitor small changes in lung function of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nevertheless, before a measure can be used in clinical practice its measurement properties (e.g., reliability and validity) should be tested. Results showed that adventitious respiratory sounds, specially number of crackles, when recorded in the inspiratory phase have excellent reliability and moderate validity to assess lung function in patients with COPD. Thus, crackles might be a promising measure to monitor lung function in patients with COPD.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherUniversidade de Aveiropt_PT
dc.relationSFRH/BD/101951/2014pt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleValidity and reliability of adventitious computerised respiratory sounds in COPDpt_PT
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewednopt_PT
ua.event.date13 junho, 2017pt_PT
degois.publication.titleResearch Day 2017pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://academia.web.ua.pt/researchday/2017_ResearchDay_BookOfPosters.pdfpt_PT
Appears in Collections:Lab3R - Comunicações

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017_Oliveira_Validity and reliability of.pdf789.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.