Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/38022
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHumenyuk, Alinapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorBaptista, Inês G.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Rodrigo O.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSá-Couto, Pedropt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Marcopt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T08:09:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-14T08:09:18Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-30-
dc.identifier.issn2184-5794pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/38022-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objective: Individual health and organizational performance are strongly influenced by how people manage stress, or how they cope. Analysis and understanding of bidirectional association of BriefCOPE and COPSOQII and a unidirectional association of these two with “Índice de Capacidade para o Trabalho (ICT)”, a Portuguese version of Work Ability Index (WAI) in a health care professionals (e.g. Physicians, Nurses…) database (incomplete cases: n=909, complete cases: n=652). Methods: The Brief-COPE is a 28 item self-report questionnaire designed to measure effective and ineffective ways to cope with a stressful life event. The psychosocial factors of work were evaluated using the COPSOQII. This questionnaire comprises 76 items divided into 29 scales. The WAI assesses the work ability, considering their health status, physical and mental demands, and work-related resources. To explore the association between Sociodemographic variables, BrieCOPE and COPSOQII with WAI, the chi-squared test (for categorical variables) and the Kruskal-Wallis test (for quantitative variables) were applied. Exploratory Factorial Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA) methods todetermine the model structure and fitness were also used. Results: The WAI classification for the health care professionals was: poor/moderate (n=123; 18.9%), good (n=349, 53.5%), excellent (n=180, 27.6%). The sociodemographic variables showed no significant association with WAI categories. For the BriefCOPE scale, significant results were found with WAI categories in 8 of 14 dimensions (e.g active coping, denial, and substance use). For the COPSOQII scale, significant results were found with WAI categories in 28 of 29 dimensions (e.g work pace, burnout, and bullying). By EFA, the best model of BriefCOPE (oblimin rotation) with 4 dimensions was obtained, explaining in total 55% of the data variance. The best resulting model for COPSOQII, composed of 7 dimensions (varimax rotation), explains 63% of the total variance. These best models were used to be compared to the respective CFA. The results for the CFAs were not satisfactory given that the CFI and TLI indices were not good. Conclusions: The main conclusion is that the fitting of the models does not have good results, even considering the models proposed by EFA. This might be explained due to the aggregation of all heath care professionals since different types of healthcare professionals have different work environments and demands.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherUniversity of Aveiropt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectHealth professionalspt_PT
dc.subjectWAIpt_PT
dc.subjectBriefCOPEpt_PT
dc.subjectCOPSOQIIpt_PT
dc.titleRelationship between WAI, BriefCOPE and COPSOQII scales: a multivariate analysis on health care professionalspt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.titleJournal of Statistical on Health Decisionpt_PT
degois.publication.volumeVol 5, No 2pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.34624/jshd.v5i2.31567pt_PT
dc.identifier.articlenumbere31567pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CIDMA - Artigos
DMat - Artigos
ESSUA - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
31567-Manuscript Body-80067-2-10-20230530.pdf906.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.