Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35987
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDi Pirro, Elenapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Rúbenpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFidélis, Teresapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSallustio, Lorenzopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRoebeling, Peterpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarchetti, Marcopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorLasserre, Brunopt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T12:44:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-25T12:44:47Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-
dc.identifier.issn2073-445Xpt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/35987-
dc.description.abstractEuropean countries recently prepared recovery and resilience plans (RRPs) to recover from the pandemic crisis and reach climate neutrality. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are recognized as crucial drivers to fostering climate transition while addressing other challenges. Accordingly, RRPs offer the opportunity to promote the adoption of NBS. This article assesses the NBS embedded- ness in the policy discourse of Italian and Portuguese RRPs and how they are considered to meet climate–and related environmental–targets. We conducted a discourse analysis based on two steps, (i) a quantitative analysis to classify different nature-related terms into four categories—biophysical elements, general environmental concepts, threats and challenges, and NBS—and estimate their frequency in the text; (ii) a qualitative analysis to understand the relationship between the categories of challenges and NBS as well as the dedicated investments. The results show that NBS are barely mentioned, with a frequency in the texts for the NBS category of 0.04% and 0.01%, respectively, in Italian and Portuguese RRPs. Narratives are mainly built around general concepts such as re- silience and sustainability with nature scarcely considered as an ex novo solution to meet challenges. Notwithstanding, Italy invests 330 M in the implementation of urban forests, while in Portugal, no specific NBS interventions have been considered so far. To date, both countries are primarily orienting the climate transition toward reducing emissions instead of combining these measures with multifunctional NBS to address environmental and socio-economic challenges.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherMDPIpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F50017%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationUIDB/ECI/04450/2020pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F50017%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/OE/SFRH%2FBD%2F147883%2F2019/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectDiscourse analysispt_PT
dc.subjectEnvironmental policiespt_PT
dc.subjectGreen dealpt_PT
dc.subjectNextGenerationEUpt_PT
dc.subjectBio-based economypt_PT
dc.subjectClimate changept_PT
dc.subjectUrban forestspt_PT
dc.titleThe Embeddedness of Nature-Based Solutions in the Recovery and Resilience Plans as Multifunctional Approaches to Foster the Climate Transition: The Cases of Italy and Portugalpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.issue8pt_PT
degois.publication.titleLandpt_PT
degois.publication.volume11pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/land11081254pt_PT
dc.identifier.articlenumber1254pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DAO - Artigos
GOVCOPP - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2022_land-11-01254-v2.pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.