Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35987
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Di Pirro, Elena | pt_PT |
dc.contributor.author | Mendes, Rúben | pt_PT |
dc.contributor.author | Fidélis, Teresa | pt_PT |
dc.contributor.author | Sallustio, Lorenzo | pt_PT |
dc.contributor.author | Roebeling, Peter | pt_PT |
dc.contributor.author | Marchetti, Marco | pt_PT |
dc.contributor.author | Lasserre, Bruno | pt_PT |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-25T12:44:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-25T12:44:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2073-445X | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35987 | - |
dc.description.abstract | European countries recently prepared recovery and resilience plans (RRPs) to recover from the pandemic crisis and reach climate neutrality. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are recognized as crucial drivers to fostering climate transition while addressing other challenges. Accordingly, RRPs offer the opportunity to promote the adoption of NBS. This article assesses the NBS embedded- ness in the policy discourse of Italian and Portuguese RRPs and how they are considered to meet climate–and related environmental–targets. We conducted a discourse analysis based on two steps, (i) a quantitative analysis to classify different nature-related terms into four categories—biophysical elements, general environmental concepts, threats and challenges, and NBS—and estimate their frequency in the text; (ii) a qualitative analysis to understand the relationship between the categories of challenges and NBS as well as the dedicated investments. The results show that NBS are barely mentioned, with a frequency in the texts for the NBS category of 0.04% and 0.01%, respectively, in Italian and Portuguese RRPs. Narratives are mainly built around general concepts such as re- silience and sustainability with nature scarcely considered as an ex novo solution to meet challenges. Notwithstanding, Italy invests 330 M in the implementation of urban forests, while in Portugal, no specific NBS interventions have been considered so far. To date, both countries are primarily orienting the climate transition toward reducing emissions instead of combining these measures with multifunctional NBS to address environmental and socio-economic challenges. | pt_PT |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
dc.publisher | MDPI | pt_PT |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F50017%2F2020/PT | pt_PT |
dc.relation | UIDB/ECI/04450/2020 | pt_PT |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F50017%2F2020/PT | pt_PT |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/OE/SFRH%2FBD%2F147883%2F2019/PT | pt_PT |
dc.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Discourse analysis | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Environmental policies | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Green deal | pt_PT |
dc.subject | NextGenerationEU | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Bio-based economy | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Climate change | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Urban forests | pt_PT |
dc.title | The Embeddedness of Nature-Based Solutions in the Recovery and Resilience Plans as Multifunctional Approaches to Foster the Climate Transition: The Cases of Italy and Portugal | pt_PT |
dc.type | article | pt_PT |
dc.description.version | published | pt_PT |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
degois.publication.issue | 8 | pt_PT |
degois.publication.title | Land | pt_PT |
degois.publication.volume | 11 | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/land11081254 | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.articlenumber | 1254 | pt_PT |
Appears in Collections: | CESAM - Artigos DAO - Artigos GOVCOPP - Artigos |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022_land-11-01254-v2.pdf | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.