Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34891
Title: Digitalized transcranial electrical stimulation: a consensus statement
Author: Brunoni, Andre R
Ekhtiari, Hamed
Antal, Andrea
Auvichayapat, Paradee
Baeken, Chris
Benseñor, Isabela M
Bikson, Marom
Boggio, Paulo
Borroni, Barbara
Brighina, Filippo
Brunelin, Erome
Carvalho, Sandra
Caumo, Wolnei
Ciechanski, Patrick
Charvet, Leigh
Clark, Vincent P
Kadosh, Roi Cohen
Cotelli, Maria
Datta, Abhishek
Deng, Zhi-De
Raedt, Rudi De
Ridder, Dirk De
Fitzgerald, Paul B
Floel, Agnes
Frohlich, Flavio
George, Mark S
Ghobadi-Azbari, Peyman
Goerigk, Stephan
Hamilton, Roy H
Jaberzadeh, Shapour J
Hoy, Kate
Kidgell, Dawson J
Zonoozi, Arash Khojasteh
Kirton, Adam
Laureys, Steven
Lavidor, Michal
Lee, Kiwon
Leite, Jorge
Lisanby, Sarah H
Loo, Colleen
Martin, Donel M
Miniussi, Carlo
Mondino, Marine
Monte-Silva, Katia
Morales-Quezada, Leon
Nitsche, Michael A
Okano, Alexandre H
Oliveira, Claudia S
Onarheim, Balder
Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
Padberg, Frank
Nakamura-Palacios, Ester M
Palm, Ulrich
Paulus, Walter
Plewnia, Christian
Priori, Alberto
Rajji, Tarek K
Razza, Lais B
Rehn, Erik M
Ruffini, Giulio
Schellhorn, Klaus
Zare-Bidoky, Mehran
Simis, Marcel
Skorupinski, Pawel
Suen, Paulo
Thibaut, Aurore
Valiengo, Leandro C L
Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
Vanneste, Sven
Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan
Violante, Ines R
Wexler, Anna
Woods, Adam J
Fregni, Felipe
Keywords: Mobile health
Non-invasive neuromodulation
Digital health
Systematic review
Delphi panel
Issue Date: Sep-2022
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract: Objective: Although relatively costly and non-scalable, non-invasive neuromodulation interventions are treatment alternatives for neuropsychiatric disorders. The recent developments of highly-deployable transcranial electric stimulation (tES) systems, combined with mobile-Health technologies, could be incorporated in digital trials to overcome methodological barriers and increase equity of access. The study aims are to discuss the implementation of tES digital trials by performing a systematic scoping review and strategic process mapping, evaluate methodological aspects of tES digital trial designs, and provide Delphi-based recommendations for implementing digital trials using tES. Methods: We convened 61 highly-productive specialists and contacted 8 tES companies to assess 71 issues related to tES digitalization readiness, and processes, barriers, advantages, and opportunities for implementing tES digital trials. Delphi-based recommendations (>60% agreement) were provided. Results: The main strengths/opportunities of tES were: (i) non-pharmacological nature (92% of agreement), safety of these techniques (80%), affordability (88%), and potential scalability (78%). As for weaknesses/threats, we listed insufficient supervision (76%) and unclear regulatory status (69%). Many issues related to methodological biases did not reach consensus. Device appraisal showed moderate digitalization readiness, with high safety and potential for trial implementation, but low connectivity. Conclusions: Panelists recognized the potential of tES for scalability, generalizability, and leverage of digital trials processes; with no consensus about aspects regarding methodological biases. Significance: We further propose and discuss a conceptual framework for exploiting shared aspects between mobile-Health tES technologies with digital trials methodology to drive future efforts for digitizing tES trials.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34891
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.08.018
ISSN: 1388-2457
Appears in Collections:DEP - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Preprint.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.