Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29732
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNegrões, Nunopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSarmento, Pedropt_PT
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Joanapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorEira, Catarinapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRevilla, Eloypt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Carlospt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSollmann, Rahelpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorTôrres, Natália M.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, Mariana M.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorJácomo, Anah T. A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Leandropt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-05T16:13:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-05T16:13:46Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn0022-541Xpt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/29732-
dc.description.abstractWe used remotely triggered cameras to collect data on Puma (Puma concolor) abundance and occupancy in an area of tropical forest in Brazil where the species’ status is poorly known. To evaluate factors influencing puma occupancy we used data from 5 sampling campaigns in 3 consecutive years (2005 to 2007) and 2 seasons (wet and dry), at a state park and a private forest reserve. We estimated puma numbers and density for the 2007 sampling data by developing a standardized individual identification method. We based individual identification on 1) time-stable parameters (SP; physical features that do not change over time), and 2) time-variable parameters (VP; marks that could change over time such as scars and botfly marks). Following individual identification we established a capture–recapture history and analyzed it using closed population capture–mark–recapture models. Puma capture probability was influenced by camera placement (roads vs. trails), sampling year, and prey richness. Puma occupancy was positively associated with species richness and there was a correlation between relative puma and jaguar (Panthera onca) abundance. Identifications enabled us to generate 8 VP histories for each photographed flank, corresponding to 8 individuals. We estimated the sampled population at 9 pumas (SE 5 1.03, 95% CI 5 8–10 individuals) translating to a density of 3.40 pumas/100 km2. Information collected using camera-traps can effectively be used to assess puma population size in tropical forests. As habitat progressively disappears and South American felines become more vulnerable, our results support the critical importance of private forest reserves for conservation.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherWileypt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F23894%2F2005/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectAmazon Basinpt_PT
dc.subjectCamera-trappingpt_PT
dc.subjectCAPTURE softwarept_PT
dc.subjectDensity estimationpt_PT
dc.subjectIndividual identificationpt_PT
dc.subjectPrivate reservept_PT
dc.subjectPuma concolorpt_PT
dc.titleUse of camera-trapping to estimate puma density and influencing factors in central Brazilpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage1195pt_PT
degois.publication.issue6pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage1203pt_PT
degois.publication.titleJournal of Wildlife Managementpt_PT
degois.publication.volume74pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.2193/2009-256pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1937-2817pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DBio - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Negroes et al. - 2010 - Use of Camera-Trapping to Estimate Puma Density an.pdf738.01 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.