Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28724
Title: Harmonizing across environmental nanomaterial testing media for increased comparability of nanomaterial datasets
Author: Geitner, Nicholas K.
Ogilvie Hendren, Christine
Cornelis, Geert
Kaegi, Ralf
Lead, Jamie R.
Lowry, Gregory V.
Lynch, Iseult
Nowack, Bernd
Petersen, Elijah
Bernhardt, Emily
Brown, Scott
Chen, Wei
de Garidel-Thoron, Camille
Hanson, Jaydee
Harper, Stacey
Jones, Kim
von der Kammer, Frank
Kennedy, Alan
Kidd, Justin
Matson, Cole
Metcalfe, Chris D.
Pedersen, Joel
Peijnenburg, Willie J. G. M.
Quik, Joris T. K.
Rodrigues, Sónia M.
Rose, Jerome
Sayre, Phil
Simonin, Marie
Svendsen, Claus
Tanguay, Robert
Tefenkji, Nathalie
van Teunenbroek, Tom
Thies, Gregory
Tian, Yuan
Rice, Jacelyn
Turner, Amalia
Liu, Jie
Unrine, Jason
Vance, Marina
White, Jason C.
Wiesner, Mark R.
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
Abstract: The chemical composition and properties of environmental media determine nanomaterial (NM) transport, fate, biouptake, and organism response. To compare and interpret experimental data, it is essential that sufficient context be provided for describing the physical and chemical characteristics of the setting in which a nanomaterial may be present. While the nanomaterial environmental, health and safety (NanoEHS) field has begun harmonization to allow data comparison and re-use (e.g. using standardized materials, defining a minimum set of required material characterizations), there is limited guidance for standardizing test media. Since most of the NM properties driving environmental behaviour and toxicity are medium-dependent, harmonization of media is critical. A workshop in March 2016 at Duke University identified five categories of test media: aquatic testing media, soil and sediment testing media, biological testing media, engineered systems testing media and product matrix testing media. For each category of test media, a minimum set of medium characteristics to report in all NM tests is recommended. Definitions and detail level of the recommendations for specific standardized media vary across these media categories. This reflects the variation in the maturity of their use as a test medium and associated measurement techniques, variation in utility and relevance of standardizing medium properties, ability to simplify standardizing reporting requirements, and in the availability of established standard reference media. Adoption of these media harmonization recommendations will facilitate the generation of integrated comparable datasets on NM fate and effects. This will in turn allow testing of the predictive utility of functional assay measurements on NMs in relevant media, support investigation of first principles approaches to understand behavioral mechanisms, and support categorization strategies to guide research, commercial development, and policy.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28724
DOI: 10.1039/C9EN00448C
ISSN: 2051-8153
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DQ - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
geitner2019.pdf2.62 MBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.