Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28299
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrito, Ginapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Tinapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Joãopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Eleazarpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Conceiçãopt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T11:02:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-28T11:02:34Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn0931-1890pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/28299-
dc.description.abstractMicropropagated plants from two wild-olive species, Olea maderensis and O. europaea ssp. europaea var. sylvestris were screened for genetic stability. O. maderensis shoots were elongated/multiplied on OMG medium with zeatin (9.12 lM), and rooted on 1/2 OMG with NAA (3.22 lM). O. europaea var. sylvestris shoots were elongated/multiplied on OM medium with zeatin, and rooting was optimal after a hormonal shock (IBA 100 lM) followed by transfer to the same medium without growth regulators. In both species, acclimatization was successful and plants looked normal and morphologically identical to the donor field trees. Genetic variability was assessed at several stages of the micropropagation process using flow cytometry (FCM) and nuclear microsatellites (SSR). No changes in ploidy level were found among micropropagated plants, though small deviations, putatively due to the negative effects of cytosolic compounds on propidium iodide staining, between these and field plants were observed. In SSRs analyses, ten SSR markers were able to distinguish between genotypes. No mutations were found in these tested SSR loci among the donor tree and micropropagated plants, suggesting, for the tested markers, genetic uniformity throughout the process. The FCM and SSR results obtained do not exclude the occurrence of other changes in the nuclear genome but, considering the morphological stability of micropropagated plants, indicate that both protocols are suitable and efficient for large scale, true-to-type micropropagation of these two wild olive species.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagpt_PT
dc.relationPOCTI/AGR/60672/2004pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F6012%2F2001/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F36601%2F2007/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F27467%2F2006/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectIn vitro culturept_PT
dc.subjectOlea sp.pt_PT
dc.subjectPloidy levelpt_PT
dc.subjectSomaclonal variationpt_PT
dc.subjectSSRpt_PT
dc.titleAssessment of genetic stability of two micropropagated wild olive species using flow cytometry and microsatellite markerspt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage723pt_PT
degois.publication.issue4pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage732pt_PT
degois.publication.titleTreespt_PT
degois.publication.volume24pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00468-010-0442-9pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1432-2285pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DBio - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Brito et al. - 2010 - Assessment of genetic stability of two micropropag.pdf549.36 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.