Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28083
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Aldapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPinho, Cátiapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFrancesco, Silvia dept_PT
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Paulapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Joanapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Anapt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T15:34:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-26T15:34:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.issn954-6111pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/28083-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Physiotherapy may play a role in the recovery of signs, symptoms and function of patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) but its effectiveness is still controversial. Objectives: To assess the effects of respiratory physiotherapy compared with standard pharmacological care on symptoms and function in outpatients with LRTI. Design: Single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Setting: Outpatients were recruited from the casualties of a central hospital. Participants: Outpatients with LRTI were recruited and randomly allocated to the control (pharmacological) or experimental (pharmacological and respiratory physiotherapy) group. Intervention: The intervention consisted of conventional pharmacological treatment and conventional pharmacological treatment plus respiratory physiotherapy. Respiratory physiotherapy included breathing and airway clearance techniques, exercise training and education during 3-weeks, 3 times per week. Main outcome measure: Primary outcome measures - occupation rate of wheezes Wh%; Secondary outcome measures - number of crackles, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) modified Borg scale (mBorg), modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC), 6-min walk test (6MWT), forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity, and volume and density of the lung and bronchial tree volume. Results: Ninety-seven patients (53 controls and 44 experimental) completed the intervention. After the intervention, both groups improved significantly in all variables (0.0001 < p < 0.04; 0.001<ƞ2<0.092), with the exception of the mBorg. The magnitude of improvement of the experimental group exceeded the control group in the number of crackles, SpO2 levels, mMRC and 6MWT (0.002 < p < 0.032; 0.002<ƞ2<0.092). Conclusion: Adding respiratory physiotherapy to the pharmacological treatment of outpatients with LRTI results in greater recovery of symptoms and function parameters. Trial registration: NCT02053870.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/101943/PTpt_PT
dc.relationUID/BIM/04501/2019pt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectComputerised respiratory soundspt_PT
dc.subjectCTpt_PT
dc.subjectLRTIpt_PT
dc.subjectOutcome measurept_PT
dc.subjectRehabilitationpt_PT
dc.titleA randomized controlled trial of respiratory physiotherapy in lower respiratory tract infectionspt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage1 - 105861pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage8 - 105861pt_PT
degois.publication.titleRespiratory Medicinept_PT
degois.publication.volume162pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rmed.2019.105861pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1532-3064pt_PT
Appears in Collections:DETI - Artigos
IBIMED - Artigos
IEETA - Artigos
ESSUA - Artigos
Lab3R - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_Marques_A randomized controlled trial of respiratory physiotherapy in Lowe.pdf1.2 MBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.