Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22370
Title: | Validity, reliability and ability to identify fall status of the Berg Balance Scale, BESTest, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest in patients with COPD |
Author: | Jácome, Cristina Cruz, Joana Oliveira, Ana Marques, Alda |
Keywords: | Falls and falls prevention Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Balance Tests and measurements |
Issue Date: | 1-Nov-2016 |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
Abstract: | Background The Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest are useful in the assessment of balance. Their psychometric properties, however, have not been tested in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective This study aimed to compare the validity, reliability, and ability to identify fall status of the BBS, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and the Brief-BESTest in patients with COPD. Design A cross-sectional study was conducted. Methods Forty-six patients (24 men, 22 women; mean age=75.9 years, SD=7.1) were included. Participants were asked to report their falls during the previous 12 months and to fill in the Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. The BBS and the BESTest were administered. Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores were computed based on the participants' BESTest performance. Validity was assessed by correlating balance tests with each other and with the ABC Scale. Interrater reliability (2 raters), intrarater reliability (48–72 hours), and minimal detectable changes (MDCs) were established. Receiver operating characteristics assessed the ability of each balance test to differentiate between participants with and without a history of falls. Results Balance test scores were significantly correlated with each other (Spearman correlation rho=.73–.90) and with the ABC Scale (rho=.53–.75). Balance tests presented high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.85–.97) and intrarater reliability (ICC=.52–.88) and acceptable MDCs (MDC=3.3–6.3 points). Although all balance tests were able to identify fall status (area under the curve=0.74–0.84), the BBS (sensitivity=73%, specificity=77%) and the Brief-BESTest (sensitivity=81%, specificity=73%) had the higher ability to identify fall status. Limitations Findings are generalizable mainly to older patients with moderate COPD. Conclusions The 4 balance tests are valid, reliable, and valuable in identifying fall status in patients with COPD. The Brief-BESTest presented slightly higher interrater reliability and ability to differentiate participants' fall status. |
Peer review: | yes |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22370 |
DOI: | 10.2522/ptj.20150391 |
ISSN: | 0031-9023 |
Appears in Collections: | IBIMED - Artigos Lab3R - Artigos |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016_Jacome_Fall Status of Patients With COPD.pdf | 855.34 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.