Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/21703
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmador, Filomenapt
dc.contributor.authorMartinho, Ana Paulapt
dc.contributor.authorBacelar-Nicolau, Paulapt
dc.contributor.authorCaeiro, Sandrapt
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Carla Padrelpt
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-23T12:35:08Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-23T12:35:08Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0260-2938pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/21703-
dc.description.abstractUniversities are an important part of the process of change taking place in society. However, this is often overshadowed by these institutions giving priority to technocratic models in the relationship between science and society. In this context, according to Habermas, theories can serve to clarify practical questions and guide praxis into the right actions (social emancipation and rational autonomy). Habermas introduces the need to evaluate the particular contexts in which scientific arguments are made and assessed. The aim of this study was to develop a set of assessment criteria for education for sustainable development in higher education curricula. These were developed in line with Habermas by introducing further adaptions within the context of education for sustainable development. These criteria were tested in a blended learning master’s programme in Environmental Citizenship and Participation at the Universidade Aberta, Portugal. The following research tools were used as follows: (i) a questionnaire survey to the graduates; (ii) content analysis applied to the information guide and to the abstracts of the dissertations that were produced. The case study revealed that an absence of theoretical frameworks could lead to inconsistencies between theory and praxis. Improvements to curricula are then drawn from this study.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherTaylor and Francispt
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjecteducation for sustainable developmentpt
dc.subjecthigher educationpt
dc.subjecttheory of knowledge-constitutive interestspt
dc.titleEducation for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxispt
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.firstPage867pt
degois.publication.issue6
degois.publication.issue6pt
degois.publication.lastPage882pt
degois.publication.titleAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Educationpt
degois.publication.volume40pt
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02602938.2015.1054783pt
Appears in Collections:CIDTFF - Artigos



FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.