Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/41398
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, José Valdemarpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPrates, Pedropt_PT
dc.contributor.authorKhalfallah, Alipt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-09T11:04:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-09T11:04:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.isbn978-2-87019-302-0-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/41398-
dc.description.abstractTube hydroforming (THF) is a plastic forming process that uses tubes with an initial circular cross section, in which pressurized fluid and axial feeds are applied for producing parts with various cross-sectional shapes. Despite of the complexity of THF process, a great progress in the automotive and aerospace industry has been made due to its advantages, such as, consolidation and weight reduction over conventional stamped and welded parts. The analysis of THF process is typically based on deterministic approaches, excluding scattering effects that influence the process reliability. Thus, robust design of tube hydroforming aims to vanish noise factors effects on process responses by considering the influence of process parameters variability. If this fluctuation is not monitored, then the fluctuation of the hydroformed parts quality may contribute to high scrap rates. In this work, the influence of variability in the THF material and process parameters (e.g. yield stress, strength coefficient, strain hardening exponent, plastic anisotropy, initial tube thickness and bulged length) on the bursting pressure is analyzed resorting to a response surface model. The statistically significant variables, which mostly influence the free bulge hydroforming process, are identified through an analysis of variance. Assuming that the input parameters variability follows the normal distribution, the probability distribution of the bursting pressure is evaluated by involving random process variables into the built response surface model. It was shown that the initial tube thickness is the most statistically significant variable, whereas the strain hardening exponent is the least statistically significant variable.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherAIM (Association des Ingénieurs de Montefiore)pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00285%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/9471 - RIDTI/PTDC%2FEME-EME%2F31243%2F2017/PTpt_PT
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-031243pt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleEffect of input variables uncertainty in free tube hydroforming processpt_PT
dc.typebookPartpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.titleESAFORM 2021 - 24th International Conference on Material Formingpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.25518/esaform21.2364pt_PT
dc.identifier.esbn978-2-87019-303-7pt_PT
dc.identifier.articlenumber2364pt_PT
Appears in Collections:TEMA - Capítulo de livro
DEM - Capítulo de livro

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Effect-of-input-variables-uncertainty-in-free-tube-hydroforming-process.pdf321.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.