Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/41141
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChaudhary, Nehapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorYounus, Othman Isampt_PT
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Luis Neropt_PT
dc.contributor.authorGhassemlooy, Zabihpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorZvanovec, Stanislavpt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-21T13:14:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-21T13:14:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/41141-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we study the design aspects of an indoor visible light positioning (VLP) system that uses an artificial neural network (ANN) for positioning estimation by considering a multipath channel. Previous results usually rely on the simplistic line of sight model with limited validity. The study considers the influence of noise as a performance indicator for the comparison between different design approaches. Three different ANN algorithms are considered, including Levenberg-Marquardt, Bayesian regularization, and scaled conjugate gradient algorithms, to minimize the positioning error (εp) in the VLP system. The ANN design is optimized based on the number of neurons in the hidden layers, the number of training epochs, and the size of the training set. It is shown that, the ANN with Bayesian regularization outperforms the traditional received signal strength (RSS) technique using the non-linear least square estimation for all values of signal to noise ratio (SNR). Furthermore, in the inner region, which includes the area of the receiving plane within the transmitters, the positioning accuracy is improved by 43, 55, and 50% for the SNR of 10, 20, and 30 dB, respectively. In the outer region, which is the remaining area within the room, the positioning accuracy is improved by 57, 32, and 6% for the SNR of 10, 20, and 30 dB, respectively. Moreover, we also analyze the impact of different training dataset sizes in ANN, and we show that it is possible to achieve a minimum εp of 2 cm for 30 dB of SNR using a random selection scheme. Finally, it is observed that εp is low even for lower values of SNR, i.e., εp values are 2, 11, and 44 cm for the SNR of 30, 20, and 10 dB, respectively.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherMDPIpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/764461/EUpt_PT
dc.relationNEWFOCUS CA19111pt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectVisible light communication (VLC)pt_PT
dc.subjectVisible light positioningpt_PT
dc.subjectMultipath reflectionspt_PT
dc.subjectNonlinear least squarept_PT
dc.subjectArtificial neural network (ANN)pt_PT
dc.subjectBayesian regularizationpt_PT
dc.titleThe usage of ANN for regression analysis in visible light positioning systemspt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.issue8pt_PT
degois.publication.titleSensorspt_PT
degois.publication.volume22pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s22082879pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1424-8220pt_PT
dc.identifier.articlenumber2879pt_PT
Appears in Collections:DETI - Artigos
IT - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sensors-22-02879-v2.pdf4.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.