Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37054
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Sarapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Catarinapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Lilianapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Antóniopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPestana, Gabrielpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Maria Josépt_PT
dc.contributor.authorLosada, Raquelpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPires, Susanapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Oscarpt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-14T14:12:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-14T14:12:17Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-
dc.identifier.issn1875-4791pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/37054-
dc.description.abstractRobotic pets (RPs) are being increasingly used with older adults to address behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, and as a companion in aged care facilities. Main benefits include increased well-being and better social interactions. To date, little is known about the use of RPs by healthy older adults outside institutional settings. The aim of this paper is to map the research about the use of RPs in community-dwelling healthy older adults considering the users’ perspectives. A scoping review was performed using four databases (Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, PubMed, and SCOPUS), searching for papers published until May 2021. A final selection of ten documents was submitted to thematic analysis. The participants in the studies were all potential users (not actual users, since RPs were still in development). Main findings point to three themes concerning the main expected characteristics of RPs from the perspective of community-dwelling healthy older adults: (i) like reals pets, but with less maintenance; (ii) performing multiple functions, with customizability; (iii) facilitators of interactions without promoting social stigma. Community-dwelling older adults seem open to use a RP as long as it promotes their well-being without facilitating ageism. More research is needed regarding the ethics of using robotics companion pets and comprising a person-centered approach.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherSpringerpt_PT
dc.relationUIDB/4255/2020pt_PT
dc.relationUIDP/4255/2020pt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectCommunity-dwellingpt_PT
dc.subjectOlder adultspt_PT
dc.subjectRobotic petspt_PT
dc.subjectRobots technologypt_PT
dc.titleThe use of robotic pets by community-dwelling older adults: a scoping reviewpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage1481pt_PT
degois.publication.issue6pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage1492pt_PT
degois.publication.titleInternational Journal of Social Roboticspt_PT
degois.publication.volume14pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12369-022-00892-zpt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1875-4805pt_PT
Appears in Collections:IEETA - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12369-022-00892-z.pdf922.39 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.