Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35358
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Armando E.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorDib, Mario A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorKhalfallah, Alipt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Martinho S.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Marta C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, José V.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Bernardete M.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPrates, Pedro A.pt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T16:12:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-29T16:12:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-24-
dc.identifier.issn2075-4701pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/35358-
dc.description.abstractMachine learning models are built to predict the strain values for which edge cracking occurs in hole expansion tests. The samples from this test play the role of sheet metal components to be manufactured, in which edge cracking often occurs associated with a uniaxial tension stress state at the critical edges of components. For the construction of the models, a dataset was obtained experimentally for rolled ferritic carbon steel sheets of different qualities and thicknesses. Two types of tests were performed: tensile and hole expansion tests. In the tensile test, the yield stress, the tensile strength, the strain at maximum load and the elongation after fracture were determined in the rolling and transverse directions. In the hole expansion test, the strain for which edge cracking occurs, was determined. It is intended that the models can predict the strain at fracture in this test, based on the knowledge of the tensile test data. The machine learning algorithms used were Multilayer Perceptron, Gaussian Processes, Support Vector Regression and Random Forest. The traditional polynomial regression that fits a 2nd order polynomial function was also used for comparison. It is shown that machine learning-based predictive models outperform the traditional polynomial regression method; in particular, Gaussian Processes and Support Vector Regression were found to be the best machine learning algorithms that enable the most robust predictive models.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherMDPIpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00285%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00326%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00481%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F00481%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationCENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-022083pt_PT
dc.relationLA/P/0104/2020pt_PT
dc.relationLA/P/0112/2020pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/9471 - RIDTI/PTDC%2FEME-EME%2F31243%2F2017/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/9471 - RIDTI/PTDC%2FEME-EME%2F31216%2F2017/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectSheet metal formingpt_PT
dc.subjectMachine learningpt_PT
dc.subjectPredictive regression modelspt_PT
dc.subjectFracture strainpt_PT
dc.titleMachine learning for predicting fracture strain in sheet metal formingpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage1pt_PT
degois.publication.issue11pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage13pt_PT
degois.publication.titleMetalspt_PT
degois.publication.volume12pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/met12111799pt_PT
dc.identifier.articlenumber1799pt_PT
Appears in Collections:TEMA - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
metals-12-01799-v2 (1).pdf1.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.