Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32914
Title: Tenecteplase for thrombolysis in stroke patients: systematic review with meta-analysis
Author: Oliveira, M.
Fidalgo, M.
Fontão, L.
Antão, J.
Marques, S.
Afreixo, V.
Gregório, T.
Keywords: Cerebral hemorrhage
Fibrinolytic agents
Humans
Tenecteplase
Thrombolytic therapy
Thrombotic stroke
Tissue plasminogen activator
Issue Date: Apr-2021
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract: Introduction Alteplase is an approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase is a genetically modified form of alteplase, with lower cost and a more favourable pharmacokinetic profile allowing bolus injection. The aim of this study was to compare both drugs in adult patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing thrombolysis. Material and methods PubMed and CENTRAL were searched for observational and experimental studies comparing both drugs in the population of interest. Additional studies were sought in clinical trial registries and by means of reference check. The efficacy outcomes of interest were functional status at 3 months, recanalization and early neurological improvement (ENI). The safety outcomes of interest were cerebral haemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH and mortality. The effect measure of interest was the absolute risk difference (ARD). Effect measures for each outcome were pooled across studies using random effect models. Results Eight studies were included, involving 2031 patients. Overall, there were no differences in terms of good or excellent functional outcome (ARR = 0.07 and 0.03 respectively, p > 0.05 for both comparisons) but tenecteplase patients showed higher rates of recanalization (ARD = 0.11, 95% CI [0.01;0.20]) and ENI (ARD = 0.10, 95% CI [0.02;0.17]). There were no differences between groups in terms of ICH (ARD = -0.02, 95% CI [−0.06;0.01]), symptomatic ICH (ARD = 0.00, 95% CI [−0.01;0.02]) or death (ARD = 0.00, 95% CI [−0.03;0.03]). Conclusion Tenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase for stroke thrombolysis, with lower cost and a more favourable pharmacokinetic profile.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32914
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.026
ISSN: 0735-6757
Appears in Collections:CIDMA - Artigos
PSG - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MOliveira2021a.pdf2.53 MBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.