Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/31226
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Dorabellapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorde Sousa, Amaropt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMas-Machuca, Carmenpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRak, Jacekpt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-23T14:10:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-23T14:10:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/31226-
dc.description.abstractIn Software Defined Networks (SDNs), the control plane of a network is decoupled from its data plane. For scalability and robustness, the logically centralized control plane is implemented by physically placing different controllers throughout the network. The determination of the number and placement of controllers is known as the Controller Placement Problem (CPP). In the regular (i.e., failure-free) state, the control plane must guarantee a given maximum delay between every switch and its primary controller and a given maximum delay between every pair of controllers. In general, these delay bounds allow multiple solutions and, so, other goals can be used to determine the best CPP solution. In this paper, we assess the connectivity-based resilience to malicious attacks against multiple network nodes of the CPP solutions obtained with three different aims: the regular state delay optimization without any concern about attacks, the regular state delay optimization taking into consideration the worst-case attacks and the resilience optimization to attacks against multiple nodes. We assess the CPP solutions considering attacks of targeted nature (when the attacker has complete knowledge of the data plane) and attacks of non-targeted nature (i.e., random and epidemic attacks). We present computational results providing an analysis of the CPP solutions to the different types of attacks. The main conclusion is that the connectivity-based resilience between the different CPP solutions strongly depends on the network topology, the regular state delay bounds and the type of attacks. Finally, we provide insights on how SDN operators can consider the conducted assessment when deciding the controller placements in their networks.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherIEEEpt_PT
dc.relationCOST Action CA15127pt_PT
dc.relationCENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-029312pt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectResiliencept_PT
dc.subjectSoftware defined networkingpt_PT
dc.subjectAttacks against nodespt_PT
dc.subjectMalicious human activitiespt_PT
dc.subjectCommunication networkspt_PT
dc.subjectOptimizationpt_PT
dc.titleAssessment of connectivity-based resilience to attacks against multiple nodes in SDNspt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage58266pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage58286pt_PT
degois.publication.titleIEEE Accesspt_PT
degois.publication.volume9pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9398859pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071995pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn2169-3536pt_PT
Appears in Collections:DETI - Artigos
IT - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CNDeval.pdfpublished online version1.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.