Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/30474
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, F.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSousa, A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorCompleto, A.pt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T17:43:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-02T17:43:07Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-01-
dc.identifier.issn2197-1153pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/30474-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Metaphyseal sleeves are an option for patients with severe metaphyseal bony defects requiring TKA revision. Although sleeves are usually used with stems, little is known about the exact contribution/need of the stem for the initial sleeve-bone interface stability, particularly in the femur, if the intramedullary canal is deformed or bowed. It is hypothesised that diaphyseal-stem addition increases the sleeve-femur interface stability and the strain-shielding effect on the metaphyseal femur relatively to the stemless condition. Material and methods Synthetic-femur was used to measure cortex strain behaviour and implant cortex micromotions for three techniques: only femoral-component, stemless-sleeve and stemmed-sleeve. Paired t-tests were performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the difference between mean principal strains and implant-cortex micromotions. Finite-element models were developed to assess the cancellous-bone strain behaviour and sleeve-bone interface micromotions; these models were validated against the measurements. Results Cortex strains are reduced significantly (p<0.05) in 83% of strain gauges on stemmed-sleeve, which compares with 33% in stemless condition. Both techniques presented a cancellous bone strain reduction of 50% at the distal region and an increase of nearly four times at the sleeve proximal region relative to the model only with the femoral component. Both techniques presented sleeve-bone micromotions amplitude below 50-150μm, suitable for bone ingrowth. Conclusions The use of a supplemental diaphyseal-stem potentiates the risk of cortex bone resorption compared with the stemless-sleeve condition; however, the stem is not vital for increasing the initial sleeve-bone stability and has a minor effect on the cancellous-bone strain behaviour. Of a purely structural point view, appears that the use of a diaphyseal-femoral-stem with the metaphyseal sleeve is not mandatory in the revision TKA which is particularly relevant in cases where the use of stems is impracticable.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherSpringerOpenpt_PT
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-028424pt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/EME-SIS/28424/2017pt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectExperimental strainspt_PT
dc.subjectFinite element modelpt_PT
dc.subjectMetaphyseal sleevept_PT
dc.subjectStress-shieldingpt_PT
dc.subjectTotal knee arthroplastypt_PT
dc.subjectRevisionpt_PT
dc.subjectMetaphyseal bony defectspt_PT
dc.titleFemoral revision knee Arthroplasty with Metaphyseal sleeves: the use of a stem is not mandatory of a structural point of viewpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.issue1pt_PT
degois.publication.titleJournal of Experimental Orthopaedicspt_PT
degois.publication.volume7pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40634-020-00242-wpt_PT
dc.identifier.essn2197-1153pt_PT
Appears in Collections:TEMA - Artigos
DEM - Artigos



FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.