Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28929
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTraqueia, Anapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Sarapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Belémpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Fernandopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorDias, Gonçalo Paivapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFilipe, Sandrapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Ana Isabelpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Carlospt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Cláudia Amaralpt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-22T10:17:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-22T10:17:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/28929-
dc.description.abstractDespite the growing popularity of Vocational Education and Training (VET), which is mainly oriented towards labour market inclusion, literature shows that there is still stigmatization and association of those programmes with lower quality training offers when compared to the socalled general secondary education. The main aim of this article is to shed light on the differences in students’ sociodemographic profiles between the two education alternatives. It adopts a quantitative approach, exploring secondary data collected by national (e.g., Ministry of Education) and international (e.g., OECD) organizations regarding secondary education students in Portugal. Results confirm that students in VET secondary education have a different sociodemographic profile, namely in terms of income, parents’ academic qualifications and professional activities, thus presenting a clear lower social status than students in general secondary education. Indeed, VET is more common in Portuguese secondary schools with a student population originating from more disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds. This study also highlights the limitations of the available secondary data, suggesting a set of variables and hypotheses built on contributions from extant literature that may enable a better understanding of the reasons behind the differences in students’ profiles. Implications for schools and decision makers, as well as suggestions for future research, are also presented.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectVocational Education and Trainingpt_PT
dc.subjectGeneral Educationpt_PT
dc.subjectSocioeconomic characterizationpt_PT
dc.subjectSocial statuspt_PT
dc.subjectSocial representationpt_PT
dc.titleVocational education and training vs. General education: the influence of the socioeconomic context on students’ choicespt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage8450pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage8455pt_PT
degois.publication.title14th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference, INTED2020pt_PT
degois.publication.volume1pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.21125/inted.2020.2301pt_PT
Appears in Collections:ISCA-UA - Comunicações
CIPES - Comunicações
DCSPT - Comunicações
ESTGA - Comunicações
GOVCOPP - Comunicações
CLLC - Comunicações

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020 INTED-1 +pro.pdf197.03 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.