Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/17782
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Bárbarapt
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Alexandrapt
dc.contributor.authorVelho Da Maia Soares, Amadeu Mortáguapt
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Henrique Miguelpt
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-12T09:59:55Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1877-3435pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/17782-
dc.description.abstractBiodiversity offsets are compensatory mechanisms increasingly used to address ecological impacts resulting from human activities. We review the scientific literature on biodiversity offsets, published between 1999 and 2014. We found that biodiversity offset studies have increased through time. The majority of studies have been carried out in the USA. The development of biodiversity offsets schemes faces conceptual and practical challenges. The conceptual challenges discussed in the literature are: choice of metric, spatial delivery of offsets, equivalence, additionality, timing, longevity, ratios and reversibility. The practical challenges reported in the literature are: compliance, monitoring, transparency and timing of credits release. Amongst these, choice of metric and location are paramount and are related to the multidimensional nature of biodiversity and the values society places on biodiversity. Harmonized metrics such as the Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) help to address these challenges by providing comparability of biodiversity loss and gain amongst locations.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherElsevierpt
dc.relationFCT - SFRH/BD/51438/2011pt
dc.relationFCT - PTDC/AAC-AMB/114522/2009pt
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.titleBiodiversity offsets: from current challenges to harmonized metricspt
dc.typearticle
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
ua.event.titleCURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
degois.publication.firstPage61pt
degois.publication.lastPage67pt
degois.publication.titleCurrent opinion in environmental sustainabilitypt
degois.publication.volume14pt
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.008pt
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1877343515000378-main.pdf407.43 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.