Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/36695
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, S.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRebelo, P.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, G.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, E.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorGrave, A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorDias, C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSantos, C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSimões, A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarques, S.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, A. C. Condept_PT
dc.contributor.authorRijo, A. S.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMoura, M. J.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMendes, M. A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarques, A.pt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T14:23:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-28T14:23:58Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn0903-1936-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/36695-
dc.description.abstractSocial support improves general health (e.g., reduces hospitalisations and exacerbations) and well-being of people with COPD, but it has shown to be low in this population. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has potential to improve social support of people with COPD, however, this needs to be investigated. This study explored the impacts of PR on the social support of people with COPD. An observational study was conducted. Participants received community-based PR for 3 months, twice a week. Sociodemographic and lung function data were used to characterise the sample. Quantity and quality of social support were assessed with the 6-item short form Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ). For each item, participants listed all people or institutions who support them on a certain situation (range: 0-9 people; quantity) and indicated how satisfied they were with the support provided (range: 1 very dissatisfied to 6 very satisfied; quality). Total score for quantity and quality was computed using the mean scores from the 6 items. Frequencies, median and interquartile range (IQR) were used to describe the sample. Wilcoxon test was used to explore pre-post differences. Twenty-nine people with COPD (71 [65-77] years; 86.2% ♂; 54 [39.4-62.5] FEV1%pp) participated. No significant impacts were found for quantity (pre 1.5 [1-3.2] vs post 1.7 [1-2.2], p=0.135) nor quality (pre 6 [5.7-6] vs post 6 [5.4-6], p=0.299) of social support after PR. A ceiling effect seem to exist on quality. PR seems to yield minimal impact on the social support of people with COPD assessed with the SSQ. Future work on how to improve social support of people with COPD is needed (e.g., identify determinants and social responses).pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherEuropean Respiratory Societypt_PT
dc.relationPOISE-03-4639-FSE-000597pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_CENTRO/SFRH%2FBD%2F148738%2F2019/PTpt_PT
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-007628pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04501%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectSocial supportpt_PT
dc.subjectCOPDpt_PT
dc.titleImpact of pulmonary rehabilitation on the social support of people with COPDpt_PT
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
ua.event.date4-6 Setembro, 2022pt_PT
degois.publication.issuesuppl 66pt_PT
degois.publication.titleEuropean Respiratory Journal. ERS International Congress 2022pt_PT
degois.publication.volume60pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://erj.ersjournals.com/content/60/suppl_66/954pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.954pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1399-3003-
dc.identifier.articlenumber954pt_PT
Appears in Collections:ESSUA - Comunicações
IBIMED - Comunicações
Lab3R - Comunicações

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Almeida_ERS2022.pdf134.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.