Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35218
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Andreapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorHendriks, Nielspt_PT
dc.contributor.authorBranco, Rita Maldonadopt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T15:59:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-18T15:59:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-17-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/35218-
dc.description.abstractDesign can be defined as a practice (leading to artefacts and services) as well as a way to research but it also can be used to describe a way to look at the world (design thinking) (Bannon and Ehn 2012; Kimbell 2011). As an approach, design has been highlighted as a way to innovate within ill-structured problems (so-called wicked problems)(Rittel and Webber 1973) such as healthcare (Patrício et al. 2020). Within this, the authors position themselves on the continuum between design and dementia that began to emerge in the 1980s and aligned to the paradigm shift taking place in dementia care; from a purely biomedical model towards a psychosocial-oriented approach that included recognizing the influence of the designed environment (Zeisel et al. 2020). Parallel to care’s person-centered-care approach (Kitwood 1988), was design’s shift toward being more human-centered and inclusive (Roth 1999)​​. There are challenges, however, when design collaborates with professional care partners. Care’s full participation is sometimes ‘hindered’ by aspects related to design (such as academic jargon, time management, etc.) (Hendriks et al. 2017). When looking to move forward, the rules of engagement for collaboration need to be defined. It must resolve these issues but also consider the means to bridge similar challenges when working with other domains such as health policy making, care economics, human resources, logistics, etc. Based on initial research into the intersection of these different domains, this paper identifies the challenges that come with these cross-discipline, impact-orientated collaborations in terms of the expectations, methodology, processes, organisational structures, and visions of impact from non-design partners in these projects. It reflects upon the inclusion of these non-design partners in design-orientated projects and offers a series of considerations as a means to better prepare and enhance impactful collaboration within care between design and other necessary domains.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/CEEC IND 3ed/2020.04083.CEECIND%2FCP1589%2FCT0002/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectInter-disciplinary researchpt_PT
dc.subjectDesignpt_PT
dc.subjectCarept_PT
dc.subjectDementiapt_PT
dc.titleFostering impact-orientated interdisciplinary collaboration between design and carept_PT
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewednopt_PT
ua.event.date17-10 Outubro, 2022pt_PT
degois.publication.title32nd Alzheimer Europe Conferencept_PT
Appears in Collections:DeCA - Comunicações
ID+ - Comunicações

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Impact-orientated interdisciplinary collaboration between design and care v3_lowres.pdf1.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.