Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/23852
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Jacinta M.pt
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Ângela S.pt
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Adelaide P.pt
dc.contributor.authorCastilho, Fernanda B.pt
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Mário J.pt
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-16T14:28:41Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn1936-9751pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/23852-
dc.description.abstractThe control of the microbiological quality of bivalve molluscs assumes particular importance because they are among the most produced seafood products and mostly consumed as a whole, raw, or lightly cooked. The composition of the bacterial community associated with bivalves depends mostly on the microbiology of the surrounding environment at growing sites. Once the relationship between microbiology of bivalves and environment is established, a better classification and monitoring of the shellfish beds and evaluation of depuration strategies can be achieved. In this work, we tested if the methods of DNA extraction commonly used for the culture-independent microbiological analysis of sediment and water could be used directly, or with modifications, for the analysis of bacteria in mussels. The commercial kits Genomic DNA Purification Kit (MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania), UltraClean(TM) Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MOBIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and the method described by Griffiths and collaborators for DNA/RNA co-extraction were compared. The efficiency of extraction was assessed by DNA fluorescence and the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis gel patterns of 16S ribosomal RNA gene fragments were used to compare the reproducibility and representativeness of the extraction methods. Results showed that the DNA/RNA co-extraction method with modifications was the most suitable. However, the results must be interpreted in the light of the purpose of the study and the relevance of maximizing extraction yield or diversity estimate, without compromising reproducibility. To our knowledge, this was the first attempt to transpose the procedure currently used for DNA extraction from sediments or waters, to the analysis of whole mussels.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSpringerpt
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F28747%2F2006/PTpt
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectBacterial DNA extractionpt
dc.subjectDGGEpt
dc.subjectFood safetypt
dc.subjectMusselspt
dc.titleComparison of methodologies for the extraction of bacterial DNA from mussels-relevance for food safetypt
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.firstPage201pt
degois.publication.issue1
degois.publication.lastPage209pt
degois.publication.titleFood Analytical Methodspt
degois.publication.volume6pt
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12161-012-9419-1pt
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DBio - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Oliveira et al. - 2013 - Comparison of Methodologies for the Extraction of .pdf555.11 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.