Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/16739
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArturo, Gálvez-Cerónpt
dc.contributor.authorDiana, Gassópt
dc.contributor.authorJorge Ramón, López-Olverapt
dc.contributor.authorGregorio, Mentaberrept
dc.contributor.authorJordi, Bartolomépt
dc.contributor.authorIgnasi, Marcopt
dc.contributor.authorDavid, Ferrerpt
dc.contributor.authorLuca, Rossipt
dc.contributor.authorMathieu, Garelpt
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Lavínpt
dc.contributor.authorMarcus, Clausspt
dc.contributor.authorEmmanuel, Serranopt
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-02T16:00:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1470-160Xpt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/16739-
dc.description.abstractFaecal nitrogen (FN) – the combination of metabolic nitrogen and residual food nitrogen – has been used as a proxy for diet quality in wild and domestic ruminants for over half a century. However, a common misconception in some of these studies is that FN is a direct proxy for dietary N, in spite of experimental evidence that links FN to general diet digestibility. Additionally, gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) can alter N metabolism and increase FN by various mechanisms. To clarify the role of dietary N, fibre and GIN as a factor in FN excretion, 10 naturally parasitised sheep were fed two different isocaloric diets (LPF: low-protein, low-fibre; HPF: high-protein, high-fibre). One month after these diets began, a single anthelmintic treatment was applied to remove GIN, after which the sheep were kept on the same diet for an additional 2 weeks. Throughout the experiment, individual faecal samples were obtained to estimate both FN and GIN intensity (using faecal egg counts, FEC). In addition, two blood samples were taken before and after deworming to measure serum total protein concentrations (TP) as a proxy for protein absorption. In spite of the difference in dietary protein, FN was higher on an LPF diet, supporting the overall digestibility concept. The influence of GIN on FN was later revealed by the anthelmintic treatment, which led to a decrease of FEC and FN in both dietary groups. Serum total protein showed a slight but non-significant increase in both groups after the anthelmintic treatment. Our study supports not only the concept that FN is a proxy for diet digestibility, and not directly for dietary N, but also that gastrointestinal nematodes limit its use as a proxy for diet quality in ruminants, especially under high parasite loads (e.g., 1000 faecal eggs per gram of faeces). Such limitations should be considered before using FN for wildlife nutrition monitoring. Some recommendations are given to avoid misinterpretations.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherElsevierpt
dc.relationSFRH/BPD/96637/2013pt
dc.relationBIOCON08-059pt
dc.relationCGL2009-11631pt
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectAcid detergentfibrept
dc.subjectFaecal nitrogenpt
dc.subjectDiet qualitypt
dc.subjectGastrointestinal nematodespt
dc.titleGastrointestinal nematodes and dietary fibre: two factors to consider when using FN for wildlife nutrition monitoringpt
dc.typearticle
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
ua.event.titleECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
degois.publication.firstPage161pt
degois.publication.lastPage169pt
degois.publication.titleEcological indicatorspt
degois.publication.volume52pt
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.020pt
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Arturo et al. - 2015 - Gastrointestinal nematodes and dietary fibre Two .pdf597.93 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.