Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/7910
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaptista, P.pt
dc.contributor.authorCunha, T.pt
dc.contributor.authorBernardes, C.pt
dc.contributor.authorGama, C.pt
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Ó.pt
dc.contributor.authorDias, A.pt
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-10T09:32:34Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn0749-0208pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/7910-
dc.description.abstractThe shoreline change rate is one of the most significant parameters in analysing sandy shore behaviour with time. This parameter can be monitored by means flow- and high-resolution survey methods, depending on the objectives of the monitoring programme. Survey efficiency is also very important for achieving high resolution in both space and time. Another important aspect is the precision and significance of the obtained results, not only from the survey method itself but also from the comparative analysis used to process the data from several surveys. The survey method and the processing algorithms are the basis of shoreline analysis. This paper presents an evaluation of two proposed high-resolution methods that are simultaneously highly accurate and very efficient. These methods are based on a global positioning system (GPS) in differential mode for surveying and on novel algorithms for assessing the spatial change rate of the shoreline. The most significant difference of the two presented survey systems is the physical support: whereas one uses a land vehicle (motor-quad) to delineate the shoreline in wide straight coastal stretches, the other considers an on-foot simplified version to survey small, more irregular stretches. The analysis of the error associated with the proposed methodologies is thoroughly described in this paper. In both modes of operation, system-inherent errors are within the centimetre level in general lower than 0.05 m. Operation-specific errors can remain within the centimetre level, but if instrument handling is careless in the on-foot survey method, they can reach decimetre levels. If successive monitoring surveys are not carried out under similar field morphological conditions, when the frontal dune baseline is adopted as a shoreline indicator, rough errors can be introduced. Two case studies of the application of these methods, evaluating the shoreline evolution of two distinct coastal regions in Portugal, are presented.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherCoastal Education & Research Foundationpt
dc.relationFCT - PTDC/AMB/73169/2006pt
dc.relationFCT - PRAXIS 2/2.1/MAR/1743/95pt
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectGPSpt
dc.subjectcoastal erosionpt
dc.subjectmanagementpt
dc.subjectfrontal dune baselinept
dc.subjectfrontal dune crestlinept
dc.titleA precise and efficient methodology to analyse the shoreline displacement ratept
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.firstPage223pt
degois.publication.issue2pt
degois.publication.issue2
degois.publication.lastPage232pt
degois.publication.titleJournal of Coastal Researchpt
degois.publication.volume27pt
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.relation.publisherversion10.2112/09-1187.1pt
dc.identifier.doi10.2112/09-1187.1pt
Appears in Collections:DGeo - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Baptista2011 JCR.pdfDocumento principal667.51 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.