Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/6827
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGOMES, MTpt
dc.contributor.authorDUARTE, ACpt
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, JPpt
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-23T16:46:54Z-
dc.date.issued1995-
dc.identifier.issn0003-2670pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/6827-
dc.description.abstractQuartz piezoelectric crystals were coated with triethanolamine using two procedures: spray and syringe methods. The reproducibility of both coating methods was evaluated comparing the relative standard deviation of batches of four crystals coated by each of the procedures. The relative standard deviation obtained with the spray method is a hyperbolic function of the coating frequency and is, at least, three times lower than the one calculated from results of the syringe method, which is not frequency dependent. An explanation for the poorer reproducibility of the syringe method is given, based on the radial sensitivity theory and the non-uniformity of the coating distribution over the crystal, as evidenced by microscopic photographs.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherElsevierpt
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectQuartz crystal microbalancept
dc.subjectCoatingspt
dc.subjectPiezoelectric crystalspt
dc.titleComparison of two methods for coating piezoelectric crystalspt
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.firstPage329pt
degois.publication.issue1-3pt
degois.publication.issue1-3
degois.publication.lastPage334pt
degois.publication.titleAnalytica Chimica Actapt
degois.publication.volume300pt
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0003-2670(94)00361-O*
Appears in Collections:DQ - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2methods coating.pdf481.52 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.