Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/42055
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRebelo, P.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, D.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorCravo, J.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMendes, M. A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, A. C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRijo, A. S.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMoura, M. J.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarques, A.pt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T14:47:02Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-28T14:47:02Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/42055-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and objectives Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a fundamental intervention to manage COPD, however, maintaining its benefits is challenging. Engaging in physical activity might help to prolong PR benefits. This study assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of a personalised community-based physical activity programme to sustain physical activity and other health-related PR benefits, in people with COPD. Materials and methods This was a multicentre, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. Following 12-weeks of PR, people with COPD were assigned to a six-months personalised community-based physical activity programme (experimental group), or to standard care (control group). Physical activity was assessed via: time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activities per day (primary outcome measure), steps/day and the brief physical activity assessment tool. Secondary outcomes included sedentary behaviour, functional status, peripheral muscle strength, balance, symptoms, emotional state, health-related quality of life, exacerbations and healthcare utilization. Assessments were performed immediately post-PR and after three- and six-months. Efficacy and effectiveness were evaluated using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis with linear mixed models. Results Sixty-one participants (experimental group: n = 32; control group: n = 29), with balanced baseline characteristics between groups (69.6 ± 8.5 years old, 84 % male, FEV1 57.1 ± 16.7 %predicted) were included. Changes in all physical activity outcomes and in one-minute sit-to-stand were significantly different (P < 0.05) between groups at the six-month follow-up. In the remaining outcomes there were no differences between groups. Conclusions The community-based physical activity programme resulted in better physical activity levels and sit-to-stand performance, six-months after completing PR, in COPD. No additional benefits were observed for other secondary outcomes.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationCENTR(AR): pulmões em andamento (POISE-03-4639-FSE-000597)pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT//SFRH%2FBD%2F148738%2F2019/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/OE/COVID%2FBD%2F153476%2F2023/PTpt_PT
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-007628pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04501%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04501%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectPhysical activitypt_PT
dc.subjectPulmonary disease Chronic obstructivept_PT
dc.subjectCommunity integrationpt_PT
dc.subjectCommunity resourcespt_PT
dc.titleBeyond pulmonary rehabilitation: can the PICk UP programme fill the gap? A randomised trial in COPDpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.titlePulmonologypt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pulmoe.2024.04.001pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn2531-0437pt_PT
Appears in Collections:IBIMED - Artigos
ESSUA - Artigos
Lab3R - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2531043724000473-main.pdf1.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.