Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaixão, Cátiapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorGrave, Ana S.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Pedro G.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMendes, M. Aurorapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Francisca Teixeirapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorCosta, José Coutinhopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Dinapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Aldapt_PT
dc.description.abstractFalls are the 2nd leading cause of unintentional injury deaths worldwide. Poor balance has been associated with increased risk of falls in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), however little is known about balance in people with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) is a comprehensive balance measure, which allows tailoring balance training, however, its ability to identify risk of falls in people with ILD is unknown. We explored its ability in distinguishing people with ILD with high/low risk of falls. The Brief-BESTest was collected and a ROC curve analysis performed to assess its ability to differentiate between people with ILD with (≥1) and without (0) history of falls. A fall was defined as “an unexpected event when you find yourself unintentionally on the ground, floor or lower level”. History of falls was explored with 2 questions: (1) “Have you had any fall in the last 12 months?” and, if yes, (2) “How many times did you fall down in the last 12 months?”. The optimal cut-off point was identified by the highest Youden index. Differences between people with/without history of falls were explored with independent t-tests. 67 people with ILD (66±12y; 56.7%♀; FVC 80.8±18.8%predicted; DLCO 56.8±22.2%predicted) were included. From these, 20 had, at least, 1 fall in the previous year. People with history of falls were older (63±10 vs. 72±13y, p=0.015), had a worst DLCO (60.8±21.3 vs. 46.8±21.9%predicted, p=0.032) and worst balance (BriefBESTest 17.8±5.2 vs. 13.5±6.4 points, p=0.012) at baseline than those without. A cut-off point of 16 points in the Brief-BESTest for high risk of falls (AUC=0.71; 95%CI 0.56-0.85; 65% sensitivity; 75% specificity; accuracy=0.71) was found. A cut-off of 16 points in the Brief-BESTest may be helpful to easily identify those at risk of falling, and implement tailored interventions to improve balance.pt_PT
dc.publisherUA Editorapt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04501%2F2020/PTpt_PT
dc.titleCut-off of the Brief-BESTest to predict falls in people with ILDpt_PT
ua.event.date25-26 maio, 2023pt_PT
degois.publication.titleVI iBiMED Symposium: from fundamental research to clinical practice: book of abstractspt_PT
Appears in Collections:ESSUA - Comunicações
DCM - Comunicações
IBIMED - Comunicações
Lab3R - Comunicações

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023_Paixao_Cut off BriefBestestVI iBiMED Symposium - Book of Abstracts.pdf175.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.