Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/36898
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDsouza, R.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, P.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorKakkonen, M.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorJokinen, J.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSarlin, E.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorKallio, P.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorKanerva, M.pt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-06T09:15:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-06T09:15:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-28-
dc.identifier.issn0266-3538pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/36898-
dc.description.abstractThe microbond (MB) test is the most widely adopted micromechanical test to characterize fibre matrix interfaces but typically lacks reliability and output for determining multi-parameter interface models. In the current research, the MB test is enhanced by incorporating Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors for local fibre strain monitoring. Strain-force data is used to analyse and validate the type and paramter values of a cohesive zone modelling (CZM) basis in the three-dimensional interface damage model. For the prepared epoxy resin droplets, that are used as a benchmark case, a bi-linear CZM traction-separation law is fitted for each droplet. The results confirm the selection of maximum FBG strain, force–strain profile with the two primary peaks in the force–strain derivative, and the peak force to be valid for proper interface characterization. The analysis of the performed tests clearly reveal the droplet fracture process to consist of four distinct stages. Only after the first stage, interfacial crack propagation independent of the point on perimeter is achieved. Full debonding occurs during the fourth stage.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/764713/EUpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectGlass fibrespt_PT
dc.subjectFinite element analysis (FEA)pt_PT
dc.subjectCohesive zone modellingpt_PT
dc.subjectDebondingpt_PT
dc.subjectInterfacept_PT
dc.title3D interfacial debonding during microbond testing: advantages of local strain recordingpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.titleComposites Science and Technologypt_PT
degois.publication.volume195pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108163pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1879-1050pt_PT
dc.identifier.articlenumber108163pt_PT
Appears in Collections:DFis - Artigos
I3N-FSCOSD - Artigos
IT - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3D interfacial debonding during microbond testing.pdf2.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.