Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/33383
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDiogo, Sara Margarida Alpendrept_PT
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Milka Alves Correiapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Maria Teresa Geraldopt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T18:17:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-04T18:17:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-15757-9pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/33383-
dc.description.abstractThe increasing internationalization and globalization of higher education, as well as the influence of neo-liberal ideas, as the New PublicManagement (NPM) practice, strongly disseminated by international organizations, such as the OECD, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Trade Organisation (WTO), and the EU provide a framework for analyzing similarities in different national contexts. In turn, national and cultural specifics and traditions might be considered powerful factors explaining differences in the Portuguese, Brazilian, and Finnish HE systems, more specifically with respect to policy design, policy implementation, and national outcomes. By comparing different cultures, systems, and institutional practices, through the same methods of data collection and analysis for each country, this chapter provides an overview of the main policies and practices in terms of HE governance and management in these countries. Portugal and Finland are examples of European countries that have embarked on changes eased up by an international context that supported reform, e.g., assessments from international organizations such as the OECD and the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), and the EU modernization agendas for European HE. Moreover, both HE systems are similar enough to allow comparisons as both have a binary organization. Nevertheless, and when comparing with Brazil, a still developing nation, the economic status and international positioning of these three countries, differs. Brazil is the largest country in both South America and Latin America, with over 207 million people in 2017(Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE 2017).pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherPalgrave MacMillanpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.subjectFinlandpt_PT
dc.subjectHigher Educationpt_PT
dc.subjectGovernancept_PT
dc.subjectManagementpt_PT
dc.subjectComparative Researchpt_PT
dc.titleAn international comparative perspective on Higher Education institutions’ governance and management: Portugal, Finland, and Brazilpt_PT
dc.typebookPartpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage109pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage136pt_PT
degois.publication.titleIntercultural studies in higher education: policy and practicept_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-15758-6_5#citeaspt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-15758-6_5pt_PT
dc.identifier.esbn978-3-030-15758-6pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CIPES - Capítulo de livro
DCSPT - Capítulo de livro

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
978-3-030-15758-6_5.pdf257.51 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.