Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32768
Title: The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale
Author: Mangano, M. C.
Berlino, M.
Corbari, L.
Milisenda, G.
Lucchese, M.
Terzo, S.
Bosch-Belmar, M.
Azaza, M. S.
Babarro, J. M. F.
Bakiu, R.
Broitman, B. R.
Buschmann, A. H.
Christofoletti, R.
Dong, Y.
Glamuzina, B.
Luthman, O.
Makridis, P.
Nogueira, A. J. A.
Palomo, M. G.
Dineshram, R.
Sanchez-Jerez, P.
Sevgili, H.
Troell, M.
AbouelFadl, K. Y.
Azra, M. N.
Britz, P.
Carrington, E.
Celić, I.
Choi, F.
Qin, C.
Dionísio, M. A.
Dobroslavić, T.
Galli, P.
Giannetto, D.
Grabowski, J. H.
Helmuth, B.
Lebata-Ramos, M. J. H.
Lim, P. T.
Liu, Y.
Llorens, S. M.
Mirto, S.
Pećarević, M.
Pita, C.
Ragg, N.
Ravagnan, E.
Saidi, D.
Schultz, K.
Shaltout, M.
Tan, S. H.
Thiyagarajan, V.
Sarà, G.
Keywords: Perishable food supply chain
Disruption
Economic distress
Mitigation measures
Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture
Stakeholder perceptions
Rapid assessment
COVID-19 effects
Issue Date: Jan-2022
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract: The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32768
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.014
ISSN: 1462-9011
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DBio - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S146290112100294X-main (1).pdf11.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.