Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32452
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBourdim, Sidi Mohammed El-Aminept_PT
dc.contributor.authorBoumechra, Nadirpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorDjedid, Abdelkaderpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Hugopt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-25T13:11:37Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-25T13:11:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.issn2364-4176pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/32452-
dc.description.abstractTo obtain correctly, design of the structures under seismic loads, the methods of equivalent static and dynamic analyses are usually used. The assessment of the response of entire system soil-structure under seismic load is a fundamental step to anticipate losses and help to mitigate it. Some methods of the design of retaining walls under seismic loads require the knowledge of the maximum acceleration of seismic signal. The present work discusses these methods and a comparison with detailed analysis. Three confgurations of a retaining wall at diferent heights were considered under seismic loading: 10 signals from the 2003 Boumerdes earthquake and the 1999 Ain-Témouchent earthquake (in Algeria). Then it was assessed the dynamic thrust forces given by the approximate methods for maximum acceleration of the considered earthquakes. The approximate methods used are the pseudo-static method, the method of Seed and Whitman, the approach given in the Algerian seismic code RPA99 and the Mononobe–Okabe method. The results show that the integration of time history of seismic loading to evaluate the dynamic active earth pressure behind retaining walls is very important and can transmit higher values than the seismic force calculated by the simplifed methods. This demonstrates that an earthquake cannot be considered only by its maximum acceleration and to properly design the retaining structures, the developed energy during an earthquake must be taken into account.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherSpringerpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectRetaining wallpt_PT
dc.subjectDynamic pressurept_PT
dc.subjectTime historypt_PT
dc.subjectMononobe–Okabept_PT
dc.subjectSeed and Whitmanpt_PT
dc.subjectRPA99pt_PT
dc.subjectPlaxispt_PT
dc.titleEffect of spatio-temporal variability of the seismic signal on the dynamic pressure behind retaining wallspt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.issue1pt_PT
degois.publication.titleInnovative Infrastructure Solutionspt_PT
degois.publication.volume7pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s41062-021-00626-6pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn2364-4184pt_PT
dc.identifier.articlenumber35pt_PT
Appears in Collections:DECivil - Artigos
RISCO - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bourdim2021_Article_EffectOfSpatio-temporalVariabi.pdf2.91 MBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.