Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29922
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRobaina, Margaritapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMurillo, Kellypt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eugéniopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorVillar, Josépt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T19:24:02Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-27T19:24:02Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-15-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/29922-
dc.description.abstractThe way plastics are currently produced, used and disposed does not capture the economic benefits of a more 'circular' approach and is dramatically harming the environment. It is relevant to determine which European countries can be considered more or less efficient in the end-of-life of plastic products processes, what the sources of the inefficiencies are, and how those less efficient countries could improve their performance towards a more circular economy. Although some countries have developed a variety of quantitative indicators, there is scarcity of adequate metrics for performance measurements. This paper estimates the efficiency of 26 European countries in the context of Circular Economy, for the period 2006-2016, considering the generation of waste, recovery and recycling of plastic, with a methodology based on the Multidirectional Efficiency Analysis. Apart from identifying the most efficient countries in the studied period, results show that efficiency increases for most countries with time, and that many countries reach the full efficiency by the end of the study period, and especially by 2016. Input analysis shows that increasing capital seems to be a main driver towards efficiency, since the other inputs are used with a similar efficiency by most countries. Output analysis suggest that the difference among countries efficiency is not in their reduction of total waste or emissions, but rather in the improvement of their economic growth in a circular way, that is, improving GDP but also the recovering and recycling activities. These results could be useful to design policies towards a more efficient and circular use of plastics.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939pt_PT
dc.relationUID/EEA/50014/2019pt_PT
dc.relationUIDB/04106/2020pt_PT
dc.relationUIDP/04106/2020pt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectCircular economypt_PT
dc.subjectPlastic wastept_PT
dc.subjectEfficiency analysispt_PT
dc.subjectEuropean countriespt_PT
dc.titleCircular economy in plastic waste: efficiency analysis of European countriespt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.titleScience of the Total Environmentpt_PT
degois.publication.volume730pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139038pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1879-1026pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CIDMA - Artigos
DEGEIT - Artigos
DMat - Artigos
GOVCOPP - Artigos
FAAG - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CircularEconomy.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.