Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28886
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Sara C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Joana L.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorCachada, Anabelapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Armando C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Fernandopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSousa, José P.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Ruthpt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-20T14:06:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-20T14:06:39Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-15-
dc.identifier.issn0304-3894pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/28886-
dc.description.abstractThis study focused the ecotoxicological evaluation of four different pesticides (chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, vinclozolin, endosulfan), sprayed into an agricultural soil, using a standard battery of aquatic bioassays for testing of soil elutriates: Vibrio fischeri -Microtox(®); Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata growth inhibition; Daphnia magna acute and chronic toxicity. Despite relevant pesticide residues were recovered from the soil matrix (concentrations higher than 1000 μg kg(-1)), much lower concentrations could be retrieved from elutriates (highest records for endosulfan of ca. 250 ng L(-1)and 1400 ng L(-1); dissolved and particulate concentration, respectively) and little effects were generally found in the bioassays. Lethal effects (D. magna 48 h-EC50 of 36.8%) could be noticed following exposure to the endosulfan elutriate. Elutriates induced no toxicity on V. fischeri; algal growth was generally inhibited at high elutriate dilutions and stimulated at the lower elutriate dilutions; and no overall impairment of D. magna life-history was noticed. Results revealed that cross-contamination during field application, input of organic matter and nutrients by elutriates in test solutions, and choice of test species and endpoints may constrain the ecotoxicological assessment. Suitability of established aquatic bioassay test batteries for these purposes, and questioning on whether direct assays with soil organisms could be more protective tools is discussed.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F40052%2F2007/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F44733%2F2008/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F38418%2F2007/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectElutriatespt_PT
dc.subjectSoil toxicitypt_PT
dc.subjectPesticidespt_PT
dc.subjectLixiviationpt_PT
dc.subjectRisk assessmentpt_PT
dc.titleStructural effects of the bioavailable fraction of pesticides in soil: suitability of elutriate testingpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage215pt_PT
degois.publication.issue1-3pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage225pt_PT
degois.publication.titleJournal of Hazardous Materialspt_PT
degois.publication.volume184pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.025pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1873-3336pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DBio - Artigos
DQ - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Antunes et al. - 2010 - Structural effects of the bioavailable fraction of.pdf610.9 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.