Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28795
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPuga, João Ricardo Lavourapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorAbrantes, Nelson José Cabaçospt_PT
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Maria João Saraiva dept_PT
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Diana Catarina Simõespt_PT
dc.contributor.authorFaria, Sílvia Reginapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Fernandopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorKeizer, Jan Jacobpt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T10:00:02Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-07T10:00:02Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1085-3278pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/28795-
dc.description.abstractIn the past decades, Portugal like several other Mediterranean countries has been affected by frequent wildfires. This has led to various field tests of post-fire soil conservation measures and, in particular, mulching with forest slash residues. While forest residue mulching was shown to be highly effective in reducing post-fire erosion, its side effects on soil fauna communities have not been studied and are also difficult to predict from the – scarce – literature on mulch effects in general. Therefore, this study compared the abundance, diversity and taxonomic and functional composition of the ground-dwelling arthropod communities of three mulched and, as control, three untreated erosion plots of roughly 100 m2 that had been installed in a eucalypt plantation almost immediately after a wildfire in 2010, some five years earlier. This was done using three pitfall traps per plot, placed at the lower, middle and upper part of the study slope. Roughly five years after mulching, its impacts on the ground-dwelling arthropod were rather limited, especially compared to its effect on overall soil erosion rates. One of the few exceptions was the abundance of the Hymenoptera – one of the most frequently occurring orders – which was significantly lower in the mulched than control plots. This and other near significant mulching impacts found in this study plainly justify a follow-up study on shortterm effects.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonspt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147273/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/COMPETE/130902/PTpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/104559/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectMulchingpt_PT
dc.subjectWildfirespt_PT
dc.subjectEucalyptus plantationpt_PT
dc.subjectGround-dwelling arthropodspt_PT
dc.subjectEcological functionspt_PT
dc.titleLong‐term impacts of post‐fire mulching on ground‐dwelling arthropod communities in a eucalypt plantationpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage1156pt_PT
degois.publication.issue3pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage1162pt_PT
degois.publication.titleLand Degradation & Developmentpt_PT
degois.publication.volume28pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ldr.2583pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1099-145Xpt_PT
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DAO - Artigos
DBio - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ldr.2583.pdf160.64 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.