Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28307
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSardo, Susanapt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-29T10:48:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-29T10:48:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5275-0369-4pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/28307-
dc.description.abstractThe contemporary contexts relating to ethnomusicology and other disciplines interested in music research are changing radically. Two main reasons are at the crux of this change: (1) the presence of music in academia has grown substantially over the last 20 years; consequently, research has considerably increased; (2) the persons who until now have been crucial for our research, especially in the field of ethnomusicology, are now very conscious of their importance for research outcomes and sometimes refuse to accept their “objectification”. The latter can be seen across a large spectrum of contexts, such as those belonging to the field of subaltern studies focusing on depressive urban communities or socially marginalised groups, as well as in the context of “high culture” universesresearch developed by art music performers about contemporary composers, for example. In both cases, the researcher represents an academically powered subject of authority. His/her work aims to promote the involved subjects but, mainly, to validate him/herself as the owner of a kind of knowledge which is socially more qualified. This situation generates deep asymmetries and has been discussed by different scholars, proposing methods and research actions based on “participative-actionresearch” practices. This is the case of Orlando Fals Borda in Colombia (1991, 2003) and Paulo Freire in Brazil (1970, 1990, 1996). This paper proposes to develop a critical approach to the canonical practices of research in music and ethnomusicology. I suggest the possibility of building shared research practices in music and ethnomusicology, based on the articulation of individual knowledges and experiences (academic/non-academic; performance/composition; practice/theory) for the construction of common new knowledge. In this sense, shared research practices can generate a de-hierarchisation of knowledges and, therefore, define a possible condition for the construction of more ecological relations between different subjects involved in research.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherCambridge Scholars Publishingpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectEtnomusicologiapt_PT
dc.subjectMetodologiapt_PT
dc.subjectPráticas de investigação partilhadapt_PT
dc.titleShared research practices on and about music: toward decolonizing colonial ethnomusicologypt_PT
dc.typebookPartpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage217pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage238pt_PT
degois.publication.locationNewcastle upon Tyne, UKpt_PT
degois.publication.titleMaking music, making societypt_PT
Appears in Collections:INETmd - Capítulo de livro

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S Sardo CHAPTER NINE 2018.pdf237.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.