Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28075
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMachado, A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorValente, C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorBurtin, C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMarques, A.pt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T10:57:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-26T10:57:15Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2531-0429pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/28075-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a cornerstone intervention for the management of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, its role during acute exacerbations (AECOPD) is controversial since most studies have been conducted in hospitalised patients, when more than 80% of AECOPD are managed on an outpatient basis. This quasi-experimental pilot study assessed the effects of a community-based PR programme during mild-to-moderate AECOPD. Methods: Outpatients were recruited from hospitals and allocated to experimental (EG) or control (CG) groups. EG received standard medication plus 3-weeks of PR. The CG received standard medication. Dyspnoea (mMRC), quadriceps muscle strength (QMS), functionality (5-repetition sit-to-stand test) and impact of the disease (COPD assessment test (CAT)) were assessed within 48 h of the AECOPD onset and after PR. Symptoms of dyspnoea and fatigue (mBorg), heart and respiratory (RR) rates and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were assessed at rest and monitored in all PR sessions. Need for hospitalisation was monitored during the 3-weeks. Results:Twelve patients (69 ± 7 years, FEV1 52 ± 27 pp) in the EG and eleven in the CG (66 ± 9 years, FEV1 55 ± 22 pp) were enrolled. The EG presented significant improvements on QMS (Pre 21.0 vs. Post 25.0, p = 0.012), CAT (Pre 23.0 vs. Post 14.5, p = 0.008), symptoms of dyspnoea at rest (Pre 3.0 vs. Post 1.0, p = 0.008), SpO2 (Pre 94.0 vs. Post 96.0, p = 0.031) and RR (Pre 24.0 vs. Post 20.5, p = 0.004). No significant improvements were found in the CG.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/DTP-PIC/2284/2014pt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/SAU-SER/28806/2017pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147343/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectPulmonary diseasept_PT
dc.subjectChronic obstructivept_PT
dc.subjectDisease progressionpt_PT
dc.subjectCommunity health servicespt_PT
dc.subjectRehabilitationpt_PT
dc.titleEffects of a community-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a quasi-experimental pilot studypt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage27pt_PT
degois.publication.issue1pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage38pt_PT
degois.publication.titlePulmonologypt_PT
degois.publication.volume26pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.05.004pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn2531-0437pt_PT
Appears in Collections:IBIMED - Artigos
ESSUA - Artigos
Lab3R - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019_Machado_Effects of a community-based PR.pdf2.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.