Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/27585
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Bernardetept_PT
dc.contributor.authorAndrade-Campos, A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMartins, J. M. P.pt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-18T17:26:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-18T17:26:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-
dc.identifier.isbn978-972-789-603-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/27585-
dc.description.abstractEnsuring accurate and efficient models for the representation of the elastoplastic behaviour of sheet metals is one of the main issues in manufacturing simulation processes. Nowadays, there are a few solid numerical methodologies for predicting the material parameters from full-field strain measurements using digital image correlation (DIC) techniques. External methods, such as the Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU), search for the parameter set that minimises the gap between the experimental and numerical observations. In these methods, a total separation between the experimental and the numerical data occurs. Equilibrium methods, such as the Virtual Fields Method (VFM), search for the parameter set that balances the internal and external work according to the principle of virtual work, where the internal work is calculated using the constitutive model applied to the experimental strain field [1-5]. Both described methods are still expensive and non-robust, which is closely related with the adopted single-stage optimisation strategies. Such optimisation strategies can undergo problems of initial solution’s dependence, non-uniqueness of solution, local and premature convergence, physical constraints violation, etc. Therefore, the choice of an optimisation algorithm is not straightforward. The aim of this work is to implement and analyse advanced optimisation strategies with sequential, parallel and hybrid approaches in a parameter identification problem using both the VFM and the FEMU methods. The performance of a gradient least-squares (GLS) optimisation algorithm, a metaheuristic (MH) algorithm and their combination is compared. Moreover, the definition of the objective functions of both VFM and FEMU methods is discussed in the framework of optimisation.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherUA Editorapt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/EME-APL/29713/2017 (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-029713)pt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/EMS-TEC/6400/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016876)pt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/EME-EME/31243/2017 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031243)pt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/EME-EME/30592/2017 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030592)pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147406/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectCalibration of constitutive modelspt_PT
dc.subjectMetal plasticitypt_PT
dc.subjectFull-field measurmentspt_PT
dc.subjectFinite element model updatingpt_PT
dc.subjectVirtual fields methodpt_PT
dc.subjectGradient-based optimisation algorithmpt_PT
dc.subjectMetaheuristic optimisation algorithmpt_PT
dc.titleInverse analysis procedures for elastoplastic parameter identification using combined optimisation strategiespt_PT
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage18pt_PT
degois.publication.titleBook of abstracts of the 2nd International Conference of TEMA: mobilizing projectspt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://ria.ua.pt/handle/10773/26296pt_PT
Appears in Collections:DEM - Comunicações
TEMA - Comunicações

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
TEMA2019__Coelho, Andrade-Campos and Martins.pdf170.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.