Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/26558
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRusso, M. A.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorGama, C.pt_PT
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Alexandrapt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-17T11:14:38Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn1873-9318pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/26558-
dc.description.abstractEach year, all Member States (MS) have to deliver their national emissions inventory to the European Union for all activity sectors, following the requirements of the CLRTAP programme. Recently, the specifications of this emissions report changed, MS emissions data had to be reported in grid cells with a resolution of 0.5° × 0.5°, and now, from 2015 forward, they must use a higher resolution grid (0.1° × 0.1°). The purpose of this study is to investigate the main differences found between these two emissions inventories for Europe, focusing on Portugal as a case study, using their available common year (2015). Differences on emissions values and their spatial distribution were analysed per sector and pollutant. Additionally, to evaluate and compare the accuracy of both datasets, air quality modelling simulations were performed, and the resulting pollutant concentrations were validated using data from observations. The results found indicated major differences in several MS (e.g. France, Italy, Germany and Spain). Portugal was not one of the delta hotspots but significant differences were still found, mainly for NOx emissions for the transport sectors, both emissions and concentrations in urban areas, as well as NO2 concentrations throughout the study domain. The analysis of the air quality modelling outputs indicates that the EMEP0.1 inventory does not improve model performance, which suggests that the methodology to build EMEP0.1 was not adequate. This work highlights the importance of accurately estimating emissions data and confirms what other studies already indicated regarding uncertainties: solely improving the emissions inventory resolution does not necessarily imply higher accuracy in the results.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherSpringerpt_PT
dc.relationPTDC/AAG-MAA/2569/2014pt_PT
dc.relationUID/AMB/50017/2019pt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectAtmospheric emissionspt_PT
dc.subjectEMEP inventorypt_PT
dc.subjectInventory resolutionpt_PT
dc.subjectAir quality modellingpt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.titleHow does upgrading an emissions inventory affect air quality simulations?pt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage731pt_PT
degois.publication.issue6pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage741pt_PT
degois.publication.titleAir Quality, Atmosphere & Healthpt_PT
degois.publication.volume12pt_PT
dc.date.embargo2020-06-01-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00692-xpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11869-019-00692-xpt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1873-9326pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
DAO - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
How does upgrading an emissions inventory affect air quality simulations post-print.pdf1.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.