Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/23997
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantana, Silvinapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRente, Josépt_PT
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Conceiçãopt_PT
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, Patríciapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorSzczygiel, Ninapt_PT
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Torbenpt_PT
dc.contributor.authorJepsen, Birgittept_PT
dc.contributor.authorLanghorne, Peterpt_PT
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-03T14:30:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-03T14:30:05Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.issn0269-2155pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/23997-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate an early home-supported discharge service for stroke patients. Design: We carried out a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial (allocation ratio of 1:1) with patients assigned to either an early home-supported discharge service or usual care. Setting: The study was undertaken in Aveiro, Portugal, between April 2009 and April 2013. Subjects: We included stroke patients aged 25–85 years admitted to the stroke unit with an initial Functional Independence Measure of up to 100, who gave informed consent. Interventions: Patients in the early home-supported discharge group began their rehabilitation intervention in the stroke unit and the early home-supported discharge team worked with them at home for a maximum of one month. Patients in the control group received usual services. Main measures: The primary outcome measure was the Functional Independence Measure at six months after stroke. Results: We randomised 190 patients of whom 34 were lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences (p > 0.5) in the average scores of Functional Independence Measure between the early home- supported discharge (69 ±22; mean ±SD) and the control groups (71 ±17) measured at baseline; and between the early home-supported discharge (107 ±20) and the control groups (107 ±25) measured at six months. The number of individuals with a low Functional Independence Measure score (<60) in the early home-supported discharge group compared with the control group was higher at admission (34/95 vs. 26/95) and lower at follow-up (2/74 vs. 5/78). Conclusions: It was feasible to implement early home-supported discharge procedures in a Southern European setting, but we have not shown convincing differences in disability at six months.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationspt_PT
dc.relationFP7-Homecare 222954pt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F69892%2F2010/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectStrokept_PT
dc.subjectEarly home-supported dischargept_PT
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trialpt_PT
dc.subjectFunctional Independence Measurept_PT
dc.subjectClinical effectivenesspt_PT
dc.subjectHome rehabilitationpt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.subjectCare continuitypt_PT
dc.titleEarly home-supported discharge for patients with stroke in Portugal: a randomised controlled trialpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.description.versionpublishedpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage197pt_PT
degois.publication.issue2pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage206pt_PT
degois.publication.titleClinical rehabilitationpt_PT
degois.publication.volume31pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269215515627282pt_PT
dc.identifier.essn1477-0873pt_PT
Appears in Collections:GOVCOPP - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0269215515627282.pdf289.1 kBAdobe PDFrestrictedAccess


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.