Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22951
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJácome, Cristinapt
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Aldapt
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-23T14:55:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-23T14:55:53Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.issn0020-1324pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/22951-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Computerized respiratory sounds are a simple and noninvasive measure to assess lung function. Nevertheless, their potential to detect changes after pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is unknown and needs clarification if respiratory acoustics are to be used in clinical practice. Thus, this study investigated the short- and mid-term effects of PR on computerized respiratory sounds in subjects with COPD. METHODS: Forty-one subjects with COPD completed a 12-week PR program and a 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included dyspnea, self-reported sputum, FEV1, exercise tolerance, self-reported physical activity, health-related quality of life, and peripheral muscle strength. Computerized respiratory sounds, the primary outcomes, were recorded at right/left posterior chest using 2 stethoscopes. Air flow was recorded with a pneumotachograph. Normal respiratory sounds, crackles, and wheezes were analyzed with validated algorithms. RESULTS: There was a significant effect over time in all secondary outcomes, with the exception of FEV1 and of the impact domain of the St George Respiratory Questionnaire. Inspiratory and expiratory median frequencies of normal respiratory sounds in the 100-300 Hz band were significantly lower immediately (-2.3 Hz [95% CI -4 to -0.7] and -1.9 Hz [95% CI -3.3 to -0.5]) and at 3 months (-2.1 Hz [95% CI -3.6 to -0.7] and -2 Hz [95% CI -3.6 to -0.5]) post-PR. The mean number of expiratory crackles (-0.8, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.3) and inspiratory wheeze occupation rate (median 5.9 vs 0) were significantly lower immediately post-PR. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized respiratory sounds were sensitive to short- and mid-term effects of PR in subjects with COPD. These findings are encouraging for the clinical use of respiratory acoustics. Future research is needed to strengthen these findings and explore the potential of computerized respiratory sounds to assess the effectiveness of other clinical interventions in COPD. Copyright © 2017 by Daedalus Enterprises.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Respiratory Carept
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F84665%2F2012/PTpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectChronic lung diseasept
dc.subjectComputerized respiratory soundspt
dc.subjectRehabilitationpt
dc.titleComputerized Respiratory Sounds: Novel Outcomes for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPDpt
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.firstPage199pt
degois.publication.issue2pt
degois.publication.lastPage208pt
degois.publication.titleRespiratory Carept
degois.publication.volume62pt
dc.identifier.doi10.4187/respcare.04987pt
Appears in Collections:Lab3R - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Computerized respiratory sounds novel outcomes for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.