Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22294
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Anapt
dc.contributor.authorPinho, Cátiapt
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Sandrapt
dc.contributor.authorMarcos, Anapt
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Aldapt
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-21T15:29:10Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-21T15:29:10Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-
dc.identifier.issn0010-4825pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/22294-
dc.description.abstractComputer screen videos (CSVs) and users' facial expressions videos (FEVs) are recommended to evaluate systems performance. However, software combining both methods is often non-accessible in clinical research fields. The Observer-XT software is commonly used for clinical research to assess human behaviours. Thus, this study reports on the combination of CSVs and FEVs, to evaluate a graphical user interface (GUI). Eight physiotherapists entered clinical information in the GUI while CSVs and FEVs were collected. The frequency and duration of a list of behaviours found in FEVs were analysed using the Observer-XT-10.5. Simultaneously, the frequency and duration of usability problems of CSVs were manually registered. CSVs and FEVs timelines were also matched to verify combinations. The analysis of FEVs revealed that the category most frequently observed in users behaviour was the eye contact with the screen (ECS, 32±9) whilst verbal communication achieved the highest duration (14.8±6.9 min). Regarding the CSVs, 64 problems, related with the interface (73%) and the user (27%), were found. In total, 135 usability problems were identified by combining both methods. The majority were reported through verbal communication (45.8%) and ECS (40.8%). “False alarms” and “misses” did not cause quantifiable reactions and the facial expressions problems were mainly related with the lack of familiarity (55.4%) felt by users when interacting with the interface. These findings encourage the use of Observer-XT-10.5 to conduct small usability sessions, as it identifies emergent groups of problems by combining methods. However, to validate final versions of systems further validation should be conducted using specialized software.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherElsevierpt
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/101943/PTpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectGraphical user interfacept
dc.subjectUsability testingpt
dc.subjectFacial videospt
dc.subjectScreen videospt
dc.subjectObserver XTpt
dc.titleUsability testing of a respiratory interface using computer screen and facial expressions videospt
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.firstPage2205pt
degois.publication.issue12pt
degois.publication.lastPage2213pt
degois.publication.titleComputers in Biology and Medicinept
degois.publication.volume43pt
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.010pt
Appears in Collections:IEETA - Artigos
ESSUA - Artigos
Lab3R - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2013_Oliveira_Usability testing of a respiratory interfa.pdf950.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.