Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22124
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJácome, Cristinapt
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Inêspt
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Filipapt
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Conceiçãopt
dc.contributor.authorMcPhee, Charlottept
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Ellenpt
dc.contributor.authorDemain, Sarapt
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Danielapt
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Aldapt
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-09T12:39:45Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-08-
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/22124-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This study determined the validity, test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-balance evaluation systems test (Mini-BESTest) and brief-balance evaluation systems test (Brief-BESTest) in patients with end-stage renal disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 74 patients with end-stage renal disease (male 66.2%; 63.9 ± 15.1 years old) was conducted. Participants were asked to report the number of falls during the previous 12 months and to complete the activity-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. The BESTest was administered, and the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores were computed based on the BESTest performance. Validity was assessed by correlating balance tests with each other and with the ABC scale. Test-retest relative reliability and agreement were explored with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) equation (2,1) and the Bland and Altman method. Minimal detectable changes at the 95% confidence level were established. RESULTS: Balance test scores were significantly correlated with each other (spearman's correlation = 0.89-0.92) and with the ABC scale (spearman's correlation = 0.49-0.59). Balance tests presented high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84-0.94), with no evidence of bias. Minimal detectable change values were 10.8 (expressed as a percentage 13.5%), 5.3 (23.7%) and 5.6 (34%) points for the BESTest, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All tests are valid and reliable to assess balance in patients with end-stage renal disease. Nevertheless, based on the minimal detectable changes found, BESTest and Mini-BESTest may be the most recommended tests for this specific population. Implications for Rehabilitation Balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-balance evaluation systems test (Mini-BESTest) and brief-balance evaluation systems test (Brief-BESTest) are reliable and valid in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). The minimal detectable changes of 10.8 for the BESTest, 5.3 for the Mini-BESTest and 5.6 for the Brief-BESTest can be used by clinicians to identify a true change in balance over time or in response to interventions. Based on the minimal detectable changes found, BESTest and Mini-BESTest may be the most recommended; and the selection of one of them may be based on time and equipment availability.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherTaylor & Francispt
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectChronic kidney failurept
dc.subjectDialysispt
dc.subjectPostural balancept
dc.subjectReproducibility of resultspt
dc.subjectRisk assessmentpt
dc.titleValidity, reliability and minimal detectable change of the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest in patients with end-stage renal diseasept
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.titleDisability and Rehabilitationpt
dc.date.embargo2018-09-08T11:00:00Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638288.2017.1375034pt
Appears in Collections:IBIMED - Artigos
ESSUA - Artigos
Lab3R - Artigos



FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.