Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/20303
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Rui J. M.pt
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Ana M. B.pt
dc.contributor.authorVaz Fernandes, M. Helenapt
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Igor C. S.pt
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Ruipt
dc.contributor.authorCalado, Ricardopt
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T19:42:25Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-07T19:42:25Z-
dc.date.issued2014pt
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/20303-
dc.description.abstractThe morphological plasticity of scleractinian corals can be influenced by numerous factors in their natural environment. However, it is difficult to identify in situ the relative influence of a single biotic or abiotic factor, due to potential interactions between them. Light is considered as a major factor affecting coral skeleton morphology, due to their symbiotic relation with photosynthetic zooxanthellae. Nonetheless, most studies addressing the importance of light on coral morphological plasticity have focused on photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intensity, with the effect of light spectra remaining largely unknown. The present study evaluated how different light spectra affect the skeleton macro- and microstructures in two coral species (Acropora formosa sensu Veron (2000) and Stylophora pistillata) maintained under controlled laboratory conditions. We tested the effect of three light treatments with the same PAR but with a distinct spectral emission: 1) T5 fluorescent lamps with blue emission; 2) Light Emitting Diodes (LED) with predominantly blue emission; and 3) Light Emitting Plasma (LEP) with full spectra emission. To exclude potential bias generated by genetic variability, the experiment was performed with clonal fragments for both species. After 6 months of experiment, it was possible to detect in coral fragments of both species exposed to different light spectra significant differences in morphometry (e.g., distance among corallites, corallite diameter, and theca thickness), as well as in the organization of their skeleton microstructure. The variability found in the skeleton macro- and microstructures of clonal organisms points to the potential pitfalls associated with the exclusive use of morphometry on coral taxonomy. Moreover, the identification of a single factor influencing the morphology of coral skeletons is relevant for coral aquaculture and can allow the optimization of reef restoration efforts.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEpt
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/COMPETE/132936/PTpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectMORPHOLOGICAL PLASTICITYpt
dc.subjectPHENOTYPIC PLASTICITYpt
dc.subjectMONTASTRAEA-ANNULARISpt
dc.subjectGALAXEA-FASCICULARISpt
dc.subjectREEF CORALSpt
dc.subjectGROWTHpt
dc.subjectPORITESpt
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTpt
dc.subjectBIOMINERALIZATIONpt
dc.subjectSIDERASTREApt
dc.titleContrasting Light Spectra Constrain the Macro and Microstructures of Scleractinian Coralspt
dc.typearticlept
dc.peerreviewedyespt
ua.distributioninternationalpt
degois.publication.issue8pt
degois.publication.titlePLOS ONEpt
degois.publication.volume9pt
dc.relation.publisherversion10.1371/journal.pone.0105863pt
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0105863pt
Appears in Collections:CESAM - Artigos
CICECO - Artigos
DBio - Artigos



FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.