Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/20253
Title: Analysis of organophosphorus pesticides in whole blood by GC-MS-mu ECD with forensic purposes
Author: Valente, Nuno I. P.
Tarelho, Sonia
Castro, Andre L.
Silvestre, Armando
Teixeira, Helena M.
Keywords: CAPILLARY GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY
SOLID-PHASE MICROEXTRACTION
HUMAN-BODY FLUIDS
TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY
HUMAN SERUM
MULTIRESIDUE DETERMINATION
POSTMORTEM TOXICOLOGY
SAMPLES
CHLORPYRIFOS
EXTRACTION
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Abstract: In the present work, two multi-residue methods for the determination of ten organophosphorus pesticides (OPs), namely chlorfenvinphos, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, dimethoate, fenthion, malathion, parathion, phosalone, pirimiphos-methyl and quinalphos, in post-mortem whole blood samples are presented. The adopted procedure uses GC-MS for screening and quantitation, and GC-mu ECD (electron capture detector) for compound confirmation. Three different Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) procedures for OPs with Oasis (R) hydrophilic lipophilic balanced (HLB) and Sep-Pak (R) C18 cartridges were tested, and followed by GC-mu ECD and GC-MS analysis. The Sep-Pak (R) C18 cartridges extraction procedure was selected since it generated analytical signals 5 times higher than those obtained with the two different Oasis (R) HLB cartridges extraction procedures. The method has shown to be selective for the isolation of selected OPs as well as to the chosen internal standard (ethion) in postmortem blood samples. Calibration curves between 50 and 5000 ng/mL were prepared using weighted linear regression models (1/x(2)). It was not possible to establish a working range for fenthion by GC-mu ECD due to the lower sensitivity of the detector to this compound, whereas for pirimiphos-methyl it was set between 500 and 5000 ng/mL. The limit of quantitation was established at 50 ng/mL for all analytes, except for pirimiphos-methyl by GC-mu ECD analysis (500 ng/mL). The average extraction efficiency ranged from 72 to 102%. The developed methods were considered robust and fit for the purpose, and had already been adopted in the laboratory routine analysis. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/20253
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.03.006
ISSN: 1752-928X
Publisher Version: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.03.006
Appears in Collections:CICECO - Artigos



FacebookTwitterLinkedIn
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.